home > by publication type > daily analysis > One Europe, Many Counterterrorism Policies
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
An armed policeman outside the Palace of Westminster. (AP Images/Alastair Grant)
There is little question the United States remains a prime target for terrorists, but since President Bush declared a “war on terror” in 2001, Europe has in some ways proven a more active theater in that struggle. An April 2007 Europol report (PDF) counts 706 terror-related arrests inside the European Union in 2006 alone. These numbers do not include Britain, which claims to be investigating some 1,600 terror suspects, though it is reluctant to divulge details. Yet the wider European Union appears to recognize that a more coordinated approach may be necessary, particularly in light of the latest attacks in Britain.
While nothing like the 9/11 attacks have occurred on European soil, its cities and citizens have been targeted at least as often. TIME points out that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) central role in Afghanistan has “raised the incentive” for terrorists to strike at Germany, France, and Britain, and Claude Moniquet of the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Center says terrorists are trying to open a “new jihad” (Deutsche-Welle) in Europe. Britain’s support for the Iraq war makes it a target, just as it put Spain and Italy in the crosshairs while their troops made up significant contingents in Iraq. In early July, Spain concluded the trial of twenty-eight suspects implicated in the 2004 Madrid bombings (AP). Italy recently arrested three people suspected of operating a terrorist training school.
Perhaps because of their longer history with terrorism, Europeans seem reluctant to buy into Bush's “war” analogy, relying more on policework and intelligence (CSMonitor) and less on military operations in their counterterrorism approach. This has hampered some transatlantic cooperation—for instance, in the sharing of data between immigrations and customs officials. The European Union has been highly critical of some U.S. decisions, most notably, the detention of suspects at Guantanamo Bay Cuba, and the use of secret CIA prisons to interrogate high-level suspects.
Meanwhile, EU officials are careful to avoid using potentially controversial rhetoric. The European Union has created guidelines of offensive terminology (Daily Telegraph) that might alienate European Muslims. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown made a concerted effort to refer to the attempted attacks in London and Glasgow as criminal acts (NYT Magazine), rather than acts of war. Despite this, the Stategic Study Group, a Spanish think tank, suggests current security efforts remain heavy-handed, with Muslims unduly singled out for arrest. Europe’s more tentative views have made attempts to increase security measures controversial. Germany, in particular, has experienced internal divides over terrorism defense. After Wolfgang Schäuble, its top security official, called for detaining potential terrorists and sanctioning the killing of terrorists abroad, a “rancorous debate” (IHT) emerged over individual rights.
The strongest criticism against European efforts concerns lack of cohesion among EU member states. Washington Institute scholar Michael Jacobson argues in a CFR.org Podcast that cooperation is crucial because terrorist groups based in several countries can move freely through European borders. Yet domestic intelligence agencies are still hesitant to share information with their EU counterparts. An example of this reluctance is the European Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, which entered into force on June 1 with ratification from only seven out of thirty-nine countries. Future attacks, however, may clear some hurdles to cooperation. In the wake of the UK bombings, leaders such as Gordon Brown (Guardian) and EU Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini (BBC) have called for greater sharing of information on terror suspects in Europe.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.