home > by publication type > daily analysis > Thawing Arctic's Resource Race
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Due to the effects of global climate change, the Arctic has become a territorial issue for those seeking to claim its resources. (AP Images/RTR Channel)
This summer, a team of Russian explorers, including two members of parliament and more than one hundred scientists, went north (LAT) to prove that an Arctic underwater ridge the size of Western Europe is connected to the Siberian continental shelf. “The Arctic is Russian,” (MSNBC) said expedition leader and lawmaker Artur Chilingarov. A week after planting a flag at the North Pole—thus staking claim to the ridge and its mineral riches—Russia announced plans for another expedition to the Arctic in November to “strengthen its position” (Reuters). Russia’s flag stunt is not sitting well with Canada, which also has claims to the Arctic. Stephen Harper, Canada’s prime minister, headed north (AP) too in order to “reassert” Canadian sovereignty, noting in a speech that a “convergence of economic, environmental and strategic factors” in the region “will have critical impacts” (Bloomberg) on the future of the country. “Russia should have waited for a proper scientific review of its Arctic claims before carrying out a symbolic land grab” (CanWest News), said Rob Huebert of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies in Calgary.
For its part, Canada is claiming as its territory the “fabled” Northwest Passage (Guardian), an Arctic maritime route that would shorten shipping from the Pacific to the Atlantic by up to five thousand miles. Canada’s claim is hotly disputed by the United States, which contends the route is in international waters. The passage has long been blocked by ice (AP) but could now open up within a decade. Canada is beefing up its military presence in the region including plans for a deep-sea port. Harper said that “nothing is as fundamental as protecting Canada’s territorial integrity” (Seattle Times) at a time of rising oil, gas and mineral prices.
The pristine, resource-rich Arctic is a growing area of dispute (Spiegel) thanks to climate change. The shrinking polar ice cap has led to rival claims among the eight countries with Arctic borders: the United States, Russia, Canada, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark (via control of Greenland). The competition tests the international accord (PDF) that governs oceans and seabeds like never before. The Law of the Sea Treaty gives a nation the option of expanding its ocean economic zone—over which it has exclusive resource-development rights—beyond the two-hundred-mile limit off its coasts if it can prove that the seafloor is actually an extension of its geological territory. The United States is weighing whether to claim up to six hundred miles (USA Today) off the Alaskan coast, but some experts contend U.S. failure to ratify the treaty may complicate the issue. CFR fellow Scott Borgerson argues that the Arctic situation may require a diplomatic solution (IHT) similar to the one in place for Antarctica, where “countries bordering the Arctic could settle their sovereignty disputes in an organized and transparent way.”
In the face of the mostly dire predictions on the impacts of climate change, the shipping, oil, gas, and mining sectors are among those “expected to prosper as snow and ice melts in the north,” reports AFP. At stake are as much as 25 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas resources as well as access to new caches of minerals and untouched fish stocks. MoneySense magazine says that for investors, “there’s no time like now to stake your claim” because the “Arctic development game is still in its early innings.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.