home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S. and UN Shift on Iraq
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Despite the skepticism of many observers, the UN seeks to continue and strengthen its relief efforts in Iraq. (AP Images/Jockel Finck)
Four years after a suicide bomb ripped through UN headquarters in Baghdad, killing envoy Sergio Vieira de Mello and 21 members of his staff, the Security Council is expanding the UN’s role (Guardian) in Iraq in an effort to rein in sectarian violence. The world body has vowed to focus on national reconciliation in the ethnically-splintered nation, increase humanitarian aid, and attend to human rights. The Security Council vote on August 10 marks a symbolic if vague course correction for the UN after years of security concerns forced a low profile. The resolution allows for a modest increase (NYT) in UN personnel—though still considerably less than its presence before the 2003 bombing—and staff members recently complained about the plan’s lack of attention (al-Jazeera) to security.
Yet the renewed UN commitment to Iraq signals more than a staffing increase: It is an about-face for the United States, and some worry, a life boat shot through with holes. The United States and its allies went to war without Security Council backing, and some question whether the UN’s legitimacy will be undermined (Gulf News) by the appearance of a bailout. Jeffrey Laurenti, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation, warned weeks before the vote that a UN rescue mission would be doomed, or even targeted by insurgents, without a promise from the United States to draw down troops. Others question how the UN can bolster its mission (Newsday) with a unionized staff that clearly wants out.
The discussion wasn’t even on the table in 2003, when the United States appeared uninterested in UN help. Then last month, almost four years to the day, the Bush administration made its most public appeal for course correction. In a New York Times op-ed, the current ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, suggested that a greater UN presence would help lend credibility and help “internationalize” recovery efforts. A CFR.org interview with former Ambassador William H. Luers explores the policy shift. Khalilzad praised the resolution as “a new page” in Iraq, while UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the decision. A smattering of Iraq’s neighbors also offered accolades, and Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has reportedly embraced the idea (AP).
Amid the cheers, however, come notes of caution. In a recent Foreign Affairs article, Republican presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani, reflecting a thought common on the American right, said the UN has “proved irrelevant” in resolving “almost every major dispute of the last 50 years.” The UN itself offered a cautionary analysis. A June 5 quarterly update on UN assistance activities for Iraq warns that security threats are so high that “the only way to sustain the mission in the coming months” is to construct hardened facilities in Baghdad. The report by UN special envoy Ashraf Jehangir Qazi says redeployment of British forces in Basra led to the withdrawal of UN staff in that region due to declining security. The latest resolution leaves some wiggle room, suggesting that expansion efforts will materialize only “as circumstances permit.” Yet security remains a challenge in Iraq. The UN is seeking $130 million (Guardian) for the construction of a fortified compound in Baghdad, though funding remains a question mark. A spokeswoman for the U.S. mission to the UN tells CFR.org the United States has made no specific earmark for UN security in the Iraqi capital aside from normal expenditures.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.