Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
![]()
Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > New Year Brings Nothing New in Pyongyang
| Author: | CFR.org Staff |
|---|
South Koreans protesting the North's nuclear arsenal with dummy missiles in Seoul. (AP Images/Lee Jin-man)
The latest deal aimed at stripping North Korea of nuclear weapons, touted by the Bush administration as a breakthrough (PBS) when first proferred last year, absorbed a blow on New Year's. Pyongyang proved true to form in missing a critical deadline (LAT) for shutting down elements of its nuclear program and releasing data on its October 2006 nuclear test blast.
Since the North agreed to an action plan to demilitarize its nuclear program, is has shut down its main plutonium reactor at Yongbyon, and the deal foresees it being permanently disabled in 2008.* But the North so far has proven unwilling to take the second step. That entails Pyongyang detailing all of its nuclear activities since effectively ending its participation in the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1993.
Among the major issues at this stage is the question of whether the North has developed a parallel uranium-based bomb program. Pyongyang denies this, and has accused the United States and its Six-Party Talks partners of delaying promised economic incentives. The February agreement, like past deals on Pyongyang's nuclear program, promised energy aid and diplomatic and security guarantees if it abandons its nuclear arsenal.
The U.S. State Department has remained relatively upbeat about prospects for the deal even as the horizon has darkened. U.S. National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley told a recent CFR meeting that North Korea's denuclearization "seems to be going well" and that the United States needs to keep up the pressure. On December 30, however, anticipating North Korea's failure at New Year's, the State Department issued a mild statement complaining about foot-dragging by the North and saying it was unfortuante that the North was "slowing down the process of disablement."
The history of tumultuous diplomatic relations between North Korea and the United States always suggested that optimism might be risky. CFR.org's Crisis Guide to the Korean Peninsula provides detailed background on the conflict. Regional analyst Gordon Chang says Kim Jong-Il’s regime only bargains over nuclear issues when it is in jeopardy, and the Bush administration should move in quickly to capitalize on the narrow window to disarm the state (WSJ).
While the denuclearization process has moved ahead, related efforts at regional security continue. Japan and North Korea met late last year without getting any closer to solving issues of compensation related to Japan’s colonial rule over the Korean peninsula and Tokyo’s demands for more information on North Korea's past abductions of Japanese citizens.
In South Korea, meanwhile, last month's elections changed the face of Seoul's government as the conservative candidate, Lee Myung-bak, won by a sizeable margin over his two opponents. The Financial Times says the landslide represents a clear mandate for policy change in a country that has been dominated by left-of-center parties for the past decade.
While the election turned on economic issues, South Koreans seem to have lost some of their enthusiasm for the “sunshine” policy of presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun—a policy of engaging North Korea which will face intense scrutiny (Guardian) once Lee takes office. An analysis from the Wall Street Journal argues that South Korea’s vote could potentially fray ties with Pyongyang, particularly if Lee decides to cut back on South Korean aid to North Korea in an attempt to spur more straightforward economic ties.
*Editor's Note: The original version of this analysis transposed North Korea's plutonium and uranium bomb programs. The plutonium-based program is the one North Korea has acknowledged.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
![]()
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
![]()
![]()
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
![]()
![]()
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
![]()
![]()
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
![]()
By Region | By Issue | By Publication Type | The Think Tank | For The Media | For Educators | About CFR
Home | Site Index | FAQ | Contact | RSS | Podcast
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.

