home > by publication type > daily analysis > The Other Army in Iraq
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A recent shooting in Baghdad has refocused international attention on private secuirty firms. (AP Images/Karel Prinsloo)
A shooting incident in a busy Baghdad square has galvanized efforts to bring accountability to private security firms operating in Iraq and raises new questions (AP) about Iraqi sovereignty. Following the incident, in which guards from the U.S. security company Blackwater allegedly killed at least eleven Iraqis, Iraq’s interior ministry sought to revoke (WSJ) the firm’s operating license. Calls for expulsion have subsided, but U.S.-led investigations continue (NPR), including the involvement of the FBI. A new report (PDF) by a House oversight committee says Blackwater has been involved in at least 195 shootings since 2005, with private guards firing first in most instances. The report directs partial blame for Blackwater’s aggressive tactics on the State Department, which contracts with the company for diplomatic security. Erik Prince, Blackwater founder and CEO, said his company has “acted appropriately at all times.”
The incident comes at an awkward time for Washington, with officials planning a limited drawdown later this year and concerns lingering over manpower. More generally, the blowup over Blackwater refocuses attention on the role of international security contractors in Iraq. The picture is messy one. Thousands of contracts to private firms ensure a wide array (PDF) of services, from cooking meals for soldiers to maintaining equipment. An estimated 180,000 individuals from the United States, Iraq, and other countries make up this private army of contractors, a force that outnumbers (LAT) the entire U.S. military presence. Roughly thirty-thousand of these mercenaries conduct security missions. Last year Congress passed legislation intended to expand military laws to include private contractors, but the Pentagon has yet to publish (PDF) guidance on “how the new law is to be implemented." Complicating enforcement is a 2004 order (PDF) drafted by the Coalition Provisional Authority that specifically exempts private security firms from Iraqi prosecution. The House of Representatives passed legislation on October 4 that would bring all U.S. government contractors under the jurisdiction of federal law (NYT). But the bill, even if enacted, would not be retroactive.
Prior to the Blackwater incident, oversight of security companies generated little notice in Washington. During congressional hearings September 10 and 11, not a single lawmaker asked a question about the performance of these security contractors, which are composed mainly of former military Special Forces. The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, who is himself protected by Blackwater guards, said their efforts are “worthy of respect of all Americans.”
Some Iraqis see things differently. The Economist says that while Iraqis may dislike foreign soldiers, “they dislike even more the foreign armed men they often regard as more trigger-happy and bullying.” Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who says Blackwater has been complicit in previous civilian attacks, accused the company (LAT) of enflaming “contempt, hatred, and anger” among the Iraqi public. They are also expensive—at last count, the United States has spent nearly $4 billion on security services in Iraq, according to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA). A July 2007 Congressional Research Service report (PDF) says a lack of transparency masks true costs.
It remains unclear whether operations of Blackwater and other security firms will be curtailed. But some U.S. analysts say the rift between Washington and Baghdad could bolster Iraqi politicians. Peter W. Singer, a security industry expert at the Brookings Institution, writes that going after contractors—and not U.S. forces—is a good way to score points with domestic critics. “The Iraqi government is supposedly a sovereign state,” he writes, “so it is not surprising that at some point it would start to act like one.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.