Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > The Other Army in Iraq
| Author: |
|---|
A recent shooting in Baghdad has refocused international attention on private secuirty firms. (AP Images/Karel Prinsloo)
A shooting incident in a busy Baghdad square has galvanized efforts to bring accountability to private security firms operating in Iraq and raises new questions (AP) about Iraqi sovereignty. Following the incident, in which guards from the U.S. security company Blackwater allegedly killed at least eleven Iraqis, Iraq’s interior ministry sought to revoke (WSJ) the firm’s operating license. Calls for expulsion have subsided, but U.S.-led investigations continue (NPR), including the involvement of the FBI. A new report (PDF) by a House oversight committee says Blackwater has been involved in at least 195 shootings since 2005, with private guards firing first in most instances. The report directs partial blame for Blackwater’s aggressive tactics on the State Department, which contracts with the company for diplomatic security. Erik Prince, Blackwater founder and CEO, said his company has “acted appropriately at all times.”
The incident comes at an awkward time for Washington, with officials planning a limited drawdown later this year and concerns lingering over manpower. More generally, the blowup over Blackwater refocuses attention on the role of international security contractors in Iraq. The picture is messy one. Thousands of contracts to private firms ensure a wide array (PDF) of services, from cooking meals for soldiers to maintaining equipment. An estimated 180,000 individuals from the United States, Iraq, and other countries make up this private army of contractors, a force that outnumbers (LAT) the entire U.S. military presence. Roughly thirty-thousand of these mercenaries conduct security missions. Last year Congress passed legislation intended to expand military laws to include private contractors, but the Pentagon has yet to publish (PDF) guidance on “how the new law is to be implemented." Complicating enforcement is a 2004 order (PDF) drafted by the Coalition Provisional Authority that specifically exempts private security firms from Iraqi prosecution. The House of Representatives passed legislation on October 4 that would bring all U.S. government contractors under the jurisdiction of federal law (NYT). But the bill, even if enacted, would not be retroactive.
Prior to the Blackwater incident, oversight of security companies generated little notice in Washington. During congressional hearings September 10 and 11, not a single lawmaker asked a question about the performance of these security contractors, which are composed mainly of former military Special Forces. The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, who is himself protected by Blackwater guards, said their efforts are “worthy of respect of all Americans.”
Some Iraqis see things differently. The Economist says that while Iraqis may dislike foreign soldiers, “they dislike even more the foreign armed men they often regard as more trigger-happy and bullying.” Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who says Blackwater has been complicit in previous civilian attacks, accused the company (LAT) of enflaming “contempt, hatred, and anger” among the Iraqi public. They are also expensive—at last count, the United States has spent nearly $4 billion on security services in Iraq, according to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA). A July 2007 Congressional Research Service report (PDF) says a lack of transparency masks true costs.
It remains unclear whether operations of Blackwater and other security firms will be curtailed. But some U.S. analysts say the rift between Washington and Baghdad could bolster Iraqi politicians. Peter W. Singer, a security industry expert at the Brookings Institution, writes that going after contractors—and not U.S. forces—is a good way to score points with domestic critics. “The Iraqi government is supposedly a sovereign state,” he writes, “so it is not surprising that at some point it would start to act like one.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
