Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > If Turkey Invades
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Turkish troops ready and waiting on the Iraqi border. (AP Images/Kadir Konuksever)
Turkey removed a major legislative hurdle blocking an invasion into northern Iraq with an October 18 parliamentary vote authorizing raids (Turkish Daily News). Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan cautioned that the vote would not necessarily translate to an invasion, but analysts did not seem too reassured, particularly after an ambush (BBC) of Turkish troops by Kurdish separatists incited crisis talks in Ankara on October 21. While U.S. and Iraqi officials alike warn Turkey not to invade, CFR’s Steven A. Cook says in a podcast that a controversial vote by a U.S. congressional panel, deeming the slaughter of Armenians by Ottoman Turks in World War I a “genocide,” may have given Turkey the political catalyst needed to launch an invasion. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice responded to the ambush by asking Erdogan to hold off for a few days before launching any ground attacks, and the New York Times reports Turkish officials agreed to the request. But the pause did not quell the drumbeat of “what ifs,” and analysts focused their attentions on what the fallout might be if Turkey follows through with cross-border raids.
Most experts say the after-effects of an invasion would depend largely on the scale of the attack and how it is carried out. Iraq’s Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari has indicated he prefers limited air attacks (Gulf Daily News) on Kurdish targets to full-on land raids. Iraqi and U.S. leaders say a Turkish ground attack would work to destabilize Iraq’s north, currently one of the less volatile regions in the country. In a recent interview with CFR.org, the Kurdish head of foreign affairs in Iraq expresses hope the issue can be solved politically. The tension is particularly awkward (FT) for the United States, which finds itself stuck between a political ally in Turkey and a tactical ally in Iraq’s Kurds. Given the fragility of the current situation, Iraq’s foreign minister said in a recent statement that the effects of an invasion could ripple (VOA) well beyond northern Iraq, destabilizing the entire region.
Should this happen, one major casualty might be Iraq’s nascent government, which already struggles to keep order in a country fraught with ethnic tension. As a new Backgrounder explains, some U.S. officials are calling for schemes to manage Iraq’s regions separately—though these plans meet a contentious response from many Iraqi leaders. CFR President Emeritus Leslie H. Gelb says in an interview that a federalized Iraqi government remains the best way to “maintain harmony” among Iraq’s sects. Kurds in recent years have been able to mediate between Iraq’s Sunni and Shiite factions, and analysts worry that if they become embroiled in violence, their ability to do this will be compromised.
It remains to be seen whether Turkey will actually invade Iraq, or if authorizing raids simply represents a bargaining chip. Turkey has again called on the United States to seize Kurdish separatist fighters, and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said U.S. troops need to do more on this front. Iraqi leaders made more forceful statements (LAT) October 24, saying Iraq will “do anything to stop their terrorist activities.” Either way, intense diplomacy has broken out in an effort to stave off bloodshed. On October 19, Kurdish Iraqis held protests (NYT) in an effort to coax Turkey not to attack. Meanwhile, the Economist argues the best hope for preventing a crisis may lie not in getting Turkey to sympathize with Iraqis or Americans, but in getting Ankara to better understand its own interests. “With luck,” the article says, Turkey “will recognize that a full-blown invasion of northern Iraq would damage its interests and further inflame Kurdish separatists.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
