home > by publication type > daily analysis > Fear and Loathing on the Immigration Trail
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Despite the death of a U.S. immigration reform bill earlier this year, the issue remains a hot topic. (AP Images/Bob Child)
Some expected the death of the comprehensive immigration-reform package in June to sideline the issue until the next round of federal elections. But concern over illegal immigration has only intensified. It has provoked fierce debates coast to coast, in Congress, and among presidential contenders from both major parties. The New York state governor’s plan to issue drivers licenses to illegal immigrants is the latest flash point (NYT), prompting divisions even among Democrats who are generally united on plans to reform the country’s immigration system. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) was attacked by her rivals in an October 30 debate for equivocating when she said the licensing plan made sense but stressed she “did not say that it should be done.”
Democratic candidates are confronting immigration in Iowa, site of the crucial January 3 party caucuses. In a balancing act likely to play out across the country, they are trying to attract a growing number of Hispanic voters (NYT) while not offending long-standing residents worried about the immigrant influx. The sensitivity of the issue (Politico) is apparent in Washington, where eight Senate Democrats in late October helped defeat the DREAM Act—legislation that would have granted legal residency for students whose parents came to the United States illegally. In yet another measure of voter angst, a special election for a congressional seat in a heavily Democratic Massachusetts district in October saw the near defeat of Democrat Niki Tsongas. The closeness of the race, reports the Washington Post, was widely seen as a protest on illegal immigration issues.
Republicans have been hammering each other as well over immigration policy. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) may have suffered a mortal blow to his candidacy for the GOP nomination because of his support for the comprehensive immigration-reform measure, a feature of which was a path to citizenship for the estimated twelve million illegal immigrants in the country. The two remaining frontrunners—Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney—have sparred over the issue. At the same time they have fended off criticism from another candidate, anti-illegal immigration avatar Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO), for offering “sanctuaries” to illegal immigrants while they ran New York City and Massachusetts, respectively. This tough talk comes despite concerns raised by Michael J. Gerson, CFR senior fellow and former aide to President Bush, that the party is hurting its long-term viability by antagonizing Hispanics.
The response of nearly all candidates when confronted with illegal immigration issues is a rush to the border, with pledges to bolster controls on the U.S.-Mexico frontier. The Bush administration has been moving to press ahead with border fencing (Capitol Media Services) and other tough measures, despite a range of obstacles. Outside of plugging the border, there are calls to do more to bring illegal residents out of the shadows as well as set long-term goals that acknowledge the labor needs of U.S. agriculture and other businesses. Heritage Foundation security expert James Carafano in an Online Debate applauds efforts like the REAL ID Act, which sets national standards for identification in matters like licensing drivers.
Gordon H. Hanson, a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego, argues in a Council Special Report that immigration policy—when it is addressed again in Congress—should be flexible to adapt to labor needs. He suggests, for example, a new visa program that would allow guest workers to move between jobs. Added immigration expert Marc R. Rosenblum in another Online Debate earlier this year: “Employers and families will continue to look for ways to game the system as long as the system fails to provide needed visas.” But absent federal action, immigration anxieties will continue to play out in communities across America, one day returning to the new president’s doorstep.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.