home > by publication type > daily analysis > Russia’s Nuclear Power
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Two decades after Chernobyl, Russia is increasing its presence in the global nuclear market place. (AP Images/Efrem Lukatsky)
Before Chernobyl, history’s worst civilian nuclear accident, Soviet planners “dreamed of mobile nuclear power stations” (CSMonitor). Now a floating version of that vision, slated to begin construction (CNN) next year, is just one of twenty-six nuclear plants breaking ground in Russia, which aims to double nuclear power’s share of its electricity grid by 2030. Moscow also proposes towing floating plants to Persian Gulf state harbors as a power source for water desalination plants. One commentator for the state-run Russian Information Agency contends the floating plants would reduce (RIA Novosti) the spread of nuclear technology since such transactions would focus on selling power rather than the plants themselves. But Russian environmental activist Vladimir Slivyak argues (CSMonitor) the floating platforms pose a “clear risk of proliferation” and “will need to be protected by warships.”
Taking its vast nuclear complex to market is Russia’s latest foray as an energy superpower. Russia hopes to sell sixty nuclear power plants of various types worldwide and already builds more conventional nuclear plants for other countries than anyone else. Customers include China, India, and more controversially, Iran. Following the shelving of a deal between India and the United States for nuclear technology and fuel, one Indian columnist noted that instead of wasting time on the United States the Indian government could have “already worked out a deal with close ally Russia” (Central Chronicle).
With half the world’s enrichment capacity located in Russia, the government is “positioning Russian fuel-services companies to benefit” should the global use of nuclear power grow significantly—targeting up to 20 percent (Oxford Analytica) of the global market. Moscow also recently proposed a new multinational enrichment facility in Siberia and is looking for (IANS) international partners. Russia already supplies 50 percent of the U.S. nuclear-utility market through a post-Cold War program called Megatons to Megawatts, explained in this CFR Backgrounder, but has been barred from greater access. But a recent U.S. trade court ruling siding with Russia could spell trouble (StockInterview) for the United States Enrichment Corporation, the only commercial enrichment plant in the United States.
Russia’s plans to expand foreign markets presence could be “significantly aided” by a successful conclusion to an accord on peaceful uses of nuclear energy that could be finalized by the end of the year. The proposed deal between the United States and Russia, would broaden (CNS) the U.S. nuclear market to Russia, contends Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova, a Russia expert for Monterey Institute of International Studies. However, Mukhatzhanova notes that “even with the opening of new markets it is questionable that Russia will make enough profits to finance domestic expansion plans.”
Meanwhile, Russia only has about 4 percent of the world’s natural uranium. Unlike its considerable oil and gas reserves, Russia must secure enough uranium abroad if it’s to fulfill plans to add additional nuclear power plants and enrichment services. Australia recently agreed to supply Russia with 4,000 tons of uranium, on the condition that Russia does not sell it to any other nation or use it for military purposes. Russian President Vladimir Putin asserted if Russia needs to export uranium, its own resources “are sufficient” (AP). Though the Australia deal was hailed in the Russian press, Vladimir Milov, the president of Russia’s Institute of Energy Politics, argues it “is a clear sign of Russia’s failures” to meet its uranium needs internally, and puts Russia’s nuclear industry “at the mercy of western countries.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.