Home | Site Index | FAQs | Contact | RSS  | Podcast

• Related Materials

  • China Reaps Benefits From Our 5-Year War in Iraq
    By Michael Moran, Executive Editor, CFR.org
    Op-Ed
    March 16, 2008

  • Estimated Costs of U.S. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and of Other Activities Related to the War on Terrorism, October 2007
    Essential Documents
    October 24, 2007

  • The Right Strategy Isn't Enough
    By Stephen Sestanovich, George F. Kennan Senior Fellow for Russian and Eurasian Studies
    Op-Ed
    January 24, 2007

  • Cheney's faulty reasoning
    By Steven Simon, Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies and Daniel Benjamin, Senior Fellow in the International Security Program, Center for Strategic & International Studies
    Op-Ed
    June 22, 2006

  • National Strategy for Victory in Iraq
    Essential Documents
    November 2005

  See Also

  United States, Iraq, Intelligence, Wars and Warfare, Terrorism, U.S. Strategy and Politics

  '

  • Iraq: The Problem with Creating a New Police Force
    
  • The Pentagon's Three-Star Wise Man: Gen. Bill Odom
    
  • Minorities, Women Highly Satisfied by Military Work
    
  • The Booze Is Back in Baghdad
    
  • ‘He Should Never Have Gone to Iraq’
    

  More From:

  Newsweek International

  Latest from CFR.org

  • Speculating on Oil
    
  • A Different Tack on Terror
    
  • U.S.-Pakistan Alliance in Trouble
    
  • Pyongyang's Deal
    
  • Tapping Iraq’s Oil
    
  • Afghanistan's Struggling Security Services
    

  Columbia International Affairs Online: Iraq: "The Wrong War at the Wrong Time with the Wrong Strategy"

  Author:	Dan Caldwell

  August 5, 2007

  Summary:

  Through the entire war, President Bush has consistently been optimistic about the results of the war assuring aides that the United States was going to win because "we have no other option."  Such optimism in the face of the brutal facts on the ground is at a minimum delusional, if not irresponsible.  But the president does not bear responsibility alone.  Who or what is responsible for the mistaken assumptions, faulty intelligence and outright mistakes? 

  Excerpt:

  For his part, President Bush has been unwilling to assess the war or the decisions leading to it; according to him, "I have not looked back on one decision I have made and wished I had made it a different way."  Perhaps, one can understand the president's hesitance to engage in assessment and evaluation in the midst of war, but if the United States is to learn from the mistakes of this war, then evaluation, assessment and criticism are essential.  A problem in the evaluation of contemporary policy, however, is that many policymakers and academics are hesitant to engage in a robust, searching criticism of policy issues.  Why?  Strong criticism by current policymakers could end promotions or even careers.  Indeed, in the Navy, adopting and voicing a strong opinion that goes against the interests of the Navy, such as opposing the building of more aircraft carriers, is known as "falling on your sword," that is committing professional hari kari.  Academics in universities and think tanks are also hesitant to criticize strongly current U.S. government policies because of possible contracts with governmental agencies or potential interest in serving in government service sometime in the future.  Strong criticism could result in the cancellation or non-renewal of research or consulting contracts or could preclude government service in the future.

  If we are to hope to avoid costly mistakes like the Iraq war in the future, then it is essential to evaluate what went wrong in Iraq, and that is the central objective of this paper.  I focus on the mistaken assumptions of those who planned the war, U.S. relations with other countries in planning and prosecuting the war, faulty intelligence, the military war plan and campaign, and postwar mistakes.  The temporal focus is on the period from September 11, 2001, until 2007.  Having no government contracts or consultancies and no desire to serve in a future U.S. governmental position, I attempt to be as honest, direct and even blunt as possible.  The human and economic costs of war demand that.

  Full Text of Document

   

• 

  New CFR Books

  

  In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.

  

  America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.

  

  In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.

  Complete list of CFR Books.

  

  

  New Independent Task Force Reports

  Confronting Climate Change

  This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.

  U.S.-Latin America Relations: A New Direction for a New Reality

  This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.

  About Independent Task Forces at the Council.

  

•  

By Region  |  By Issue  |  By Publication Type  |  The Think Tank  |  For The Media  |  For Educators  |  About CFR

Home  |  Site Index  |  FAQ  |  Contact  |  RSS  |  Podcast

Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.