home > by publication type > daily analysis > Tehran’s Mood Swing
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad greets supporters in Ilam province in western Iran. (AP Images/Mehdi Ghasemi)
Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has paid a political price for his nuclear-fueled rhetoric. In February he compared Iran’s drive for nuclear energy to a runaway train with “no reverse gear” (Reuters), remarks that drew fire from Iranian moderates fearful he had done serious damage to Tehran’s diplomatic standing. In July, a panel of Iranian economists blamed the president (IHT) for Iran’s financial woes, including a spike in prices for basic commodities. Given the perceived blunders, some analysts predicted a tough reelection campaign (Foreign Policy) for the former mayor of Tehran come 2009.
But that was before Ahmadinejad’s self-described “victory” (Guardian) on December 3. A National Intelligence Estimate, the consensus view of all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, concluded Iran had most likely ceased its nuclear weapons program in 2003. The report, which stopped short of declaring dead Tehran’s ambitions for a bomb, nonetheless appeared to bolster Ahmadinejad’s claims that his country’s nuclear program was for peaceful purposes.
It was a dramatic reversal for Washington’s intelligence community. For Ahmadinejad it also was a likely boost for his embattled presidency. Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian-born Middle East analyst based in Tel Aviv, says the Iranian president emerged “the biggest victor” in the post-NIE fallout, vindicated domestically with a “stamp of approval from Washington.” Ariel Cohen, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, predicts the report could strengthen hardliners (WashTimes) “if the U.S. abandons pressure on Iran.” One woman in the western Iranian province of Ilam told a reporter that Ahmadinejad’s triumph (DPA) “against a huge country like America” convinced her entire family to vote for the president “over and over” in elections next year.
Not everyone agrees the shifts in intelligence will be good for Ahmadinejad at home. Vali Nasr, CFR’s adjunct fellow for Middle Eastern studies, says Ahmadinejad had been using the threat of a U.S attack to rally domestic support. Yet the NIE appears to have made U.S. preemptive strikes unlikely in the near-term, a development that could refocus Iranian voters’ attention on domestic issues. “If war is off the table, the Iranian electorate may pay a lot more attention to issues that don't favor Ahmadinejad in the elections,” Nasr says. Iranian moderates are also likely to remain wary of the Iranian president. Ahmadinejad added to his list of enemies in November when he accused political rivals (RFE/RL) of being “traitors” to Iran’s nuclear program. On December 11 Iran’s reformist ex-president, Mohammad Khatami, lashed out at Ahmadinejad in a rare public rebuke (NYT) of the president’s domestic policies.
But analysts Kaveh L. Afrasiabi and Kayhan Barzegar predict the NIE will strengthen (BosGlobe) Iran’s diplomatic standing and force the international community to reconsider sanctioning Tehran (Reuters) over its nuclear program. Iran has denied ever having a nuclear weapons program and some Iranian leaders have taken issue (IRNA) with the report’s claims that one existed before 2003. For his part, Ahmadinejad is revisiting all thirty of Iran’s provinces to shore up support (AFP) ahead of crucial March 14 parliamentary elections. He used one such stop on December 5 to make his “victory” declaration. And as he works to build a political base outside the capital—showing support for development projects in poor areas—the president also gloats about Washington’s softening stance, reports the Christian Science Monitor.
In the end, though, Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric may matter less than the words of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And of late, Khamenei has sent mixed messages on domestic issues. Nasr notes in the Washington Post that Khamenei has boosted Ahmadinejad’s political rivals in recent months. At the same time, however, he endorsed a “comparative hardliner” (NYT) with close ties to Ahmadinejad to serve as Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.