Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Shoring up the Banking System
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Banks fear runs of the sort seen earlier this year at Britain's Northern Rock bank. (Press Association via AP Images/John Giles)
It’s not so often that central banks team up. This month, for the first time since 9/11, they did just that when the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank (ECB), and three other major banks announced they would attempt to coordinate (Reuters) their responses to global credit concerns. The ECB and the Swiss National Bank said they would provide more loans in dollars (FT). The U.S. Fed, for its part, took a page from the playbook of several European central banks, setting up an auction facility (MarketWatch) through which banks can lend each other emergency funds. Commercial banks have expressed hesitancy about the process of taking short-term loans from the Fed’s discount window—the place where such funds are ordinarily doled out—due to the public stigma and possible share price implications associated with taking a loan. The new scheme aims to better cloak the process, allowing banks that aren’t at risk of collapsing—but need need short-term loans—to get them anonymously.
The news of the varying plans brought mixed reaction from economists. Martin Wolf writes in the Financial Times that “central banks must be pretty worried to take such a joint action.” Wolf equates the plan to helicopters dropping cash from the skies, but adds that it could feasibly work out well—under very specific circumstances. Most significantly, he says, the money must be targeted specifically at boosting market morale by avoiding the bad press associated with borrowing. It should not be used to save insolvent banks. In a new interview, CFR’s Roger M. Kubarych says that in theory the move is a “win-win situation” for banks. It’s a confidence builder, he says, because it “dramatically reduces the risk” of actually having a run at a major bank—a crisis scenario that tends to spook markets, and which has already unfolded this year at one British bank (IHT).
So, after months of financial doom and gloom, is this finally an off-ramp for embattled banks? Probably not, experts say. Failing to find loans to satisfy intraday trading is only one way for a bank to fail. Other serious threats remain. Kubarych says banks are now far more concerned about their own balance sheets than the management of their reserves. Specifically, many banks fear they still have substantial holdings of bad debt, repackaged from shaky subprime loans that may yet implode. This fear now pervades the global banking system, not just U.S. banks. The majority of subprime loans may have originated in the United States, but the debt packages they were made into were bought up globally.
The widespread uncertainty this situation has caused in part undermines the original purpose of the Fed’s auctioning plan—freeing up banks so that they, in turn, can give loans a little more freely. Until banks have a better idea what’s on their own balance sheets, the Economist says, they will remain unlikely to go out on a limb with their lending. Yet the fact of other potential land mines doesn’t mitigate the importance of stepping past the first. The hope is that the package could stave off the short-term lending crisis and allow banks to focus on their underlying finances. “But don’t be fooled,” the Economist piece concludes. “It is only a hope.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
