Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
![]()
Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
Navigation
home > by publication type > articles > Quiet continuity for U.S.-India relations
| Author: | Daniel Markey, Senior Fellow for India, Pakistan, and South Asia |
|---|
January 7, 2008
Observer Research Foundation
More than anything else, the next president of the United States is likely to pursue a steady, incremental policy of engagement with India. No rollback, no fast track, just a workmanlike consolidation of the new relationship that the Bush administration forged with two Indian governments. This news may be a letdown for fans of a stronger U.S.-India partnership, since we are not likely to see the sorts of breakthrough deals and high-stakes negotiations that have characterized the recent past.
It is hard to find evidence that any one of the major U.S. presidential contenders plans to place India at the center of his (or her) foreign policy agenda. But it is nearly impossible to identify one who would intentionally veer from the new India-friendly status quo. In itself, this transformation is significant. In American politics today, India’s democratic institutions, rapid growth, and strategic location make it an easy country to support.
Under Bush, the relationship—at least on the U.S. side—has just about managed to escape the chains of the nonproliferation debate and fly into a stable orbit at a higher altitude. If the nuclear deal finally goes through, the stage would be set for new and ambitious bilateral initiatives. But there are reasons to suspect that “ambition” may not be the defining characteristic of Washington’s India policy over the next several years.
![]()
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
In Regional Monetary Integration, Peter B. Kenen poses an important question: Should various country groups follow the lead of the European Monetary Union and form similar full-fledged monetary unions?
Walter Russell Mead recounts the story of the centuries-long rivalry between the English- speaking peoples and their enemies in God and Gold.
Complete list of CFR Books.
![]()
![]()
In this POP, Adjunct Fellow Michelle D. Gavin suggests steps the Bush administration could take to promote political and ethnic reconciliation and to restore the viability of Kenya’s governing institutions.
In this paper, Senior Fellow Daniel Markey poses a set of recommendations for the United States to consider in response to Pakistan’s ongoing political crisis.
![]()
By Region | By Issue | By Publication Type | The Think Tank | For The Media | For Educators | About CFR
Home | Site Index | FAQ | Contact | RSS | Podcast
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.

