Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Candidates Confront That Sinking Economic Feeling
| Author: |
|---|
Voters lined up outside the polling place in Manchester, N.H. on Primary day. (AP Images/Elise Amendola)
One readout from the Iowa caucuses was a deep concern about economic security in the rural state. The “anxieties about globalization are profound” for members of both parties there, said CFR Senior Fellow Peter Beinart after surprisingly big-margin wins by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and Republican Mike Huckabee. Victories in New Hampshire by Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) mirrored those concerns. A late USA Today/Gallup poll in the state was typical, showing the economy to be the most important issue for Republicans, followed closely by illegal immigration while the economy closely trailed Iraq as the most important topic for Democrats.
Though small in electoral stature like Iowa, New Hampshire is seen by some as more representative of the country, with what BusinessWeek calls a “globally oriented services-based economy and rapidly growing exurban communities.” So the New Hampshire results will be watched especially closely by strategists plotting the next month’s busy primary campaigns. Eleventh-hour campaigning by candidates such as Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Huckabee tapped into economic concerns, hitting particularly on rising energy costs. Clinton referred to an “energy crisis” with consequences “for our economy, for our security, for the problem of global warming” (NYT).
Aside from powerful campaign rhetoric about change, the sharper policy contrasts were between Republicans and Democrats than within party ranks. After a campaign marked by infighting over illegal immigration, Republican candidates largely agree on the need to tighten security at the border, as expressed in a January 5 debate in New Hampshire.
In the final Democratic debate before the New Hampshire polls, the candidates squabbled some over the extent of expanding government health care but they all favor such a move. The Democratic frontrunners have also clearly projected a slowdown in free trade agreements, and generally embrace the same ideas on broadening energy alternatives and combating global warming. Outside of economic matters, they generally approve of an early withdrawal of troops from Iraq, just as most Republican candidates, with the exception of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), generally support the troop surge in Iraq.
Differentiating among the candidates for primary voters thus becomes the battle for personal competence that has played out in both parties. In the narrative from the Obama and John Edwards camps on the Democratic side, and Huckabee and Mitt Romney on the Republican side, the political culture in the U.S. capitol is the beast that must be gored. That was a concern also expressed at a recent meeting of leading moderates from both parties who are flirting with backing an independent candidate because of their alarm at the state of partisanship in Washington. “Washington is broken,” said Romney at the January 5 Republican debate. “That was the message coming out of Iowa.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
