home > by publication type > daily analysis > McCain, Clinton Take Round Two
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Presidential primary voters in New Hampshire celebrate as their candidates' campaigns push on. (AP Images/Steven Senne)
In the crucial second round of the U.S. presidential selection process, New Hampshire primary voters revived (Union Leader) two familiar Washington figures—Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Analysts credited Clinton and McCain, third- and fourth-place finishers, respectively, in last week’s Iowa caucuses, with running vigorous campaigns highlighting their candor and capability. Their efforts seem to have connected with both Democrats and Republicans in the state, where the economy was cited as the top concern. Exit polls indicated that Iraq remained a major concern for voters of both parties, and both immigration and terrorism were listed among top priorities by Republicans, though neither made the Democratic voters’ list.
Exit polls showed distinct differences among voters for McCain and runner-up Mitt Romney, with 46 percent of those supporting McCain placing Iraq as their top issue (CNN). McCain has been a leading Republican backer of the Bush administration’s surge policy in Iraq, but surveys show he also garnered a strong share of independent voters dissatisfied with the White House (CBS). A large margin of Romney supporters considered illegal immigration the most important issue. On the Democratic side, the initial distinctions reported were demographic, with Iowa caucus winner Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) continuing to poll well among voters aged 18-29 and with a resonating message of change. Clinton won the majority of New Hampshire’s large pool of women voters and did extremely well with voters valuing experience.
The New Hampshire results shook up both party races (WSJ). For the Republicans, the McCain win sets the stage for a tough battle in January 15 primaries in Michigan, where Romney’s father previously served as governor. The economy will figure even more prominently as an issue due to the state’s sharp loss of manufacturing jobs (NYT).
Analysts say Obama remains a formidable candidate and both he and Clinton are considered to be in good shape approaching their party’s next tests—the Nevada caucuses on January 19 and the South Carolina primary a few days afterward. The third-place finishers—Iowa GOP winner Mike Huckabee and Iowa Democratic runner-up John Edwards—vowed to press on with a nationwide campaign as well.
Though small in electoral stature like Iowa, New Hampshire is seen by some as more representative of the country, with what BusinessWeek calls a “globally oriented services-based economy and rapidly growing exurban communities.” So the New Hampshire results will be watched especially closely by strategists plotting the next month’s busy primary campaigns. Eleventh-hour campaigning by candidates such as Clinton and Huckabee tapped into economic concerns, hitting particularly on rising energy costs. Clinton referred to an “energy crisis” with consequences “for our economy, for our security, for the problem of global warming” (NYT).
Aside from powerful campaign rhetoric about change, the sharper policy contrasts have been between the two parties rather than within each party’s ranks. Romney did outpoll McCain by more than three to one among New Hampshire voters who said illegal immigration was their top issue. But after a campaign marked by infighting over the issue, Republican candidates largely agree on the need to tighten security at the border, as expressed in a January 5 debate in New Hampshire.
In the final Democratic debate before the New Hampshire polls, the candidates squabbled over the extent of expanding government health care but they all favor such a move. The Democratic front-runners have also clearly projected a slowdown in free trade agreements, and generally embrace the same ideas on broadening energy alternatives and combating global warming. Outside of economic matters, they generally approve of an early withdrawal of troops from Iraq, just as most Republican candidates, with the exception of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), generally support the troop surge in Iraq.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.