home > by publication type > daily analysis > Candidates Face Gas Pump Pinch
Email
| Author: |
|---|
High gas prices–such as these found in San Mateo, CA–are a key issue for many voters during the presidential primaries. (AP Images/Paul Sakuma)
In the state of Michigan, site of the January 15 presidential primaries, gasoline prices averaged 92 cents higher than January of last year, according to one study. With the highest unemployment rate in the country, soaring foreclosure rates, and the state economy in the doldrums, Michigan voters are expected to send out what the Detroit News calls “an economic SOS.” Attempting to champion the state's beleaguered auto-manufacturing industry, Republican candidate Mitt Romney criticized the recent rise in fuel economy standards, saying: “Look, you can’t keep on throwing anvils at Michigan and the auto industry and then say, how come they are not swimming well” (WashPost). New Hampshire Republican primary winner Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who supported the change, retorted that the industry can not only meet the new standards but exceed them. Meanwhile, New Hampshire primary winner Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) unveiled a $25 billion emergency assistance proposal to help people pay for home heating (Politico).
Nationwide, the economy is also a chief concern of voters and higher gasoline prices are shaping up as a major issue (foreignpolicy.com) in the 2008 presidential campaign. A NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll taken in late 2007 shows 70 percent of respondents ranked gas prices and heating oil as the number one economic issue (PDF) significantly affecting them. The issue garnered the highest U.S. interest of any news story in 2007, says a recent Pew Research Center poll.
The candidates have certainly noticed. At a January 5 debate, McCain said: “At that price of oil we’re going to send $400 billion a year overseas to oil-producing countries.” Iowa Republican caucus winner Mike Huckabee added: “One of the reasons that we're dependent is because we have allowed the oil companies to dictate not just prices, but policy.” But in New Hampshire at least, in spite of the issue’s high profile, an International Herald Tribune article reports some voters found the candidates “had disappointingly vague approaches to energy policy.”
Biofuels enjoy bipartisan support among the candidates (AP), and the recent raising of fuel efficiency standards was widely backed by both parties in Congress. But Democrats and Republicans have differed on how to deal with the oil and gasoline issue. The recent congressional debate over the newest energy law reflected contrasts in the two parties. Democratic candidates, including John Edwards, Iowa caucus winner Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), and Clinton, would seek mandates for biofuels, favoring increasing production to around 60 billion to 65 billion gallons per year in the next two decades. Calls for biofuel mandates are similar to the requirements Democrats sought for renewable energy production—blocked by Republicans—in the new law. Several Republican candidates favor increasing biofuel production but have not called for specific production requirements.
Democratic candidates also support tougher fuel economy standards (at least 40 miles per gallon by 2020) than the latest energy law. McCain would have pushed for a fuel economy standard similar to the law but wanted to move up implementation time by four years. And some Republicans, including candidates Rudy Giuliani and Romney, favor solutions such as building more oil refineries and expanding domestic drilling, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. McCain, along with Democratic candidates, opposes drilling in the refuge.
It is unclear what effect the proposed policies would have on prices in the short term. Supply-side initiatives like more drilling can take at least five years before they can be brought online, experts say. Implementing tougher fuel economy standards is also a relatively slow process because it takes time for the nation’s auto fleet to change. And some energy experts question how much biofuels can help ease prices and bolster supplies, saying gasoline makers may respond to mandates by lowering production (AP).
Most energy experts agree that, with supplies tight and demand increasing, the days of inexpensive oil are over. A recent increase in oil market speculation has also helped increase price volatility. A CFR Task Force Report on U.S. oil dependence included among its policy options an increase in the gas tax, with the revenues possibly to be used to research energy technologies.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 