home > by publication type > daily analysis > Iraq Surge’s Mixed Messages
Email
| Author: |
|---|
U.S. army soldiers park an armored Stryker vehicle in front of K-wal combat outpost in the volatile Diyala province, about 60 miles north of Baghdad. (AP Images/Marko Drobnjakovic)
[Editor’s Note: On February 13, 2008, Iraq’s parliament passed a trio of political reforms, including one setting up provincial elections. But on February 27, a three-member panel of senior Iraqi lawmakers approved the 2008 budget and a limited amnesty provision, while dismissing the elections measure. The rejection of the bill, which was sent back to parliament, was seen as a setback for the Bush administration’s efforts to promote political reconciliation.]
When President Bush announced in January 2007 a surge of five additional combat brigades to Baghdad, he said it would improve security in the capital, giving the Iraqi government the “breathing space it needs to make progress.” But one year after the plan’s announcement, measures of its success remain complicated and politically embroiled, particularly as campaigning for the U.S. presidency heats up.
One of the strategy’s primary goals was to reduce violence through a beefed-up U.S. troop presence in and around Baghdad. The Pentagon says that is happening; insurgent attacks fell 55 percent (PDF) between June and November, though the rate of decline has since slowed somewhat (WashPost). The size of the American force in Iraq is scheduled to return to pre-surge levels in the summer of 2008, but Bush said on January 12 he would leave the final decision on troop totals to Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.
Stephen Biddle, CFR’s senior defense analyst, noted last month that voluntary cease-fires have helped stabilize once-restive regions, though he adds that more needs to be done in Iraq’s northern and southern provinces. Aware of the trend, coalition forces launched a mini-surge (CSMonitor) in early 2008 to root out remaining al-Qaeda in Iraq strongholds northeast of Baghdad, where militants regrouped after Arab tribes in Anbar province turned against the Islamist extremists. For U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ), a leading Republican candidate for president, and Joe Lieberman (I-CT), such initiatives are evidence Bush’s surge has “utterly transformed” (WSJ) Iraq’s security.
Other benchmarks on security are less encouraging. In announcing his “new way forward” Bush called for an increase in the size of the Iraqi army to thirteen divisions from ten, and to 132 battalions from 112. But according to the Defense Department, neither target has been met (PDF). Of all Iraqi army units in operations, nearly a quarter are unable to plan, execute, or sustain operations without coalition assistance, the Pentagon estimates. The surge strategy has also taken a heavy toll on U.S. forces. With 762 troops killed in action (PDF), 2007 was the deadliest year in Iraq since hostilities began in March 2003.
Despite the “breathing space” gained for Iraqi politicians, they have been slow to reach consensus on a range of crucial issues. On January 12, Iraq’s parliament passed a law allowing some former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baathist party to return to their government jobs (Reuters)—but that was the first of eighteen political benchmarks set by Washington in early 2007 to be met. Reforms on holding provincial elections, constitutional changes, and oil-revenue sharing remain stalled (NYT). Democrats in Washington have seized on the slow political progress as proof of a failed U.S. strategy. “No amount of White House spin can hide the fact that the escalation’s chief objective of political reconciliation remains unmet,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NE) said earlier this month. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) argues the United States should cut its losses. The party’s leading candidates for the White House—Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), and John Edwards—all continue to urge an early withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, although they also call for a residual U.S. force in or around Iraq.
Yet for all the political wrangling in Washington there is little doubt the debate over Iraq’s future has changed significantly since January 2007. “We appear to have finally reached a national consensus” on security gains in Iraq, says Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution. “We should not assume we have won yet…but all is far from lost in Iraq” (New Republic). Those doing the fighting, meanwhile, exhibit cautious optimism. “Success will not be akin to flipping on a light switch” (McClatchy) says Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq. “Rather, it will emerge slowly and fitfully, with reverses as well as advances.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China:” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
