home > by publication type > daily analysis > Gauging Pyongyang’s Missed Deadline
Email
| Author: |
|---|
More than 100,000 North Koreans attend a mass rally in Pyongyang in early January 2008 to support national policies published by state-controlled media. (AP Images/APTN)
The international agreement to denuclearize North Korea suffered a setback after Pyongyang missed an end-of-2007 deadline to make a full disclosure of its nuclear activities. Washington and its partners in the Six-Party Talks with North Korea now face another round of challenging diplomacy to try to put the agreement back on course. The Bush administration tried to remain upbeat despite criticism from within and outside the government. Its principle negotiator in the talks, Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, said on his recent trip to the region there is no new deadline (VOA) for Pyongyang to make a full disclosure of its nuclear activities.
The sensitivity of the issue in Washington was apparent. Jay Lefkowitz, the U.S. envoy on North Korean human rights, said Pyongyang is not serious about disarming (CNN) in a timely manner. But this prompted a rebuke from the State Department (AP), which said his comments “certainly don't represent the views of the administration.” Meanwhile, the communist state has reverted to tough language. A recent statement from North Korea’s foreign ministry claimed it fulfilled all its commitments (KCNA) and accused its Six-Party partners, including the United States, of failing to provide promised economic incentives.
The February 2007 agreement, like past deals on Pyongyang's nuclear program, promised energy aid and diplomatic and security guarantees if North Korea abandons its nuclear arsenal. Since the North agreed to demilitarize its nuclear program, it has shut down its main plutonium reactor, at Yongbyon, but among the major unresolved issues is whether the North has developed a parallel uranium-based bomb program. Pyongyang denies such a program exists and its state-owned news agency KCNA continues to heighten the threat level, citing accelerated U.S. aggression toward North Korea.
The reclusive nature of the North Korean regime makes its neighbors wary. While they continue to engage with the state, some of them also might be making back-up security plans. South Korea’s president-elect, Lee Myung-bak, who promises a tougher stance against his northern neighbor during his campaign, plans to close down the unification ministry (AP), a body that represents one of North Korea’s strongest official advocates in Seoul. Though Lee spoke of continuing inter-Korean reconciliation, he has also pledged to enhance Seoul’s military strength against Pyongyang (Korea Times). North Korea postponed its first round of talks (FT) with the South this year which analysts say appears to be a sign of Pyongyang’s uneasiness with the incoming conservative government in Seoul. CFR.org’s Crisis Guide to the Korean Peninsula provides detailed background on the conflict. A new report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the U.S. Institute of Peace, two Washington-based think tanks, says China has its own contingency plans (PDF) to dispatch troops to North Korea in case of instability. According to the report, the Chinese army could be sent into North Korea on missions to keep order if unrest triggers broader violence, including attacks on nuclear facilities in the North or South.
Amid the new developments, the Bush administration also faced tough criticism from former members of his own administration for being too soft on North Korea. John Bolton, a former State Department undersecretary for arms control and disarmament, called for the United States to extricate itself from what he called an “unwise and dangerous deal” (WSJ). Carolyne Leddy, who covered North Korea's nuclear program as director for counterproliferation strategy at the National Security Council from July 2006 to November 2007, also slams the administration (WashPost) for being too lenient on Pyongyang. “Paying off terrorists doesn’t work,” she writes. “It only encourages more terrorism. The same is true with nuclear proliferators.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.