home > by publication type > daily analysis > Domestic Spy War Intensifies
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A lineman connecting residential phone service in New York. (AP/Mark Lennihan, File)
As the clock runs down on a controversial domestic-spying program, a tangled legal and political battle mounts. President Bush warned Congress during his final State of the Union speech January 28 of dire consequences should the government’s wiretapping of overseas terror suspects be forced into temporary retirement on February 1. “If you don’t act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger,” he said. Lawmakers on January 30 answered the call (WashPost) and approved a fifteen-day extension to amendments of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). But the controversy is unlikely to subside: critics accuse the Bush administration of fearmongering (Salon) to further its spying agenda, and say even if FISA reforms expired without action the president would still be able to conduct surveillance, albeit with court approval.
Among the thorniest unresolved issues is a call to extend retroactive immunity to U.S. companies assisting in electronic monitoring of U.S. citizens. AT&T, Verizon, and other telecom giants each face multibillion dollar lawsuits for their roles in the National Security Agency’s intelligence collection efforts. Vice President Dick Cheney said in a January 2008 address to the Heritage Foundation that amnesty is needed to keep communication companies cooperating with spy agencies. “Without liability protection for past activities to aid the government, the private sector might be extremely reluctant to comply with future requests from the government,” he said. The Democratic-majority House disagrees—they passed an updated FISA bill in November minus the immunity provision—but squabbling continues in the Senate, where lawmakers cannot reach consensus on the amnesty provision.
Temporary changes to FISA adopted in August 2007—as set down in the Protect America Act (PAA)—expand the government’s power to approve international surveillance without court approval, and make warrants unnecessary for monitoring communications of persons “reasonably believed” to be located overseas. Changes in technology mean some foreign-to-foreign communications pass through “switches” on U.S. soil, thus requiring warrants to monitor them; the PAA relaxes that requirement.
Now critics of the legislation are looking for a return to more oversight. A New York Times editorial sees the Bush administration’s efforts to win amnesty for telecoms as a sinister plot of concealment. “The real aim is to make sure the full story of the illegal wiretapping never comes out in court.” The American Civil Liberties Union, in a January 22 letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), agrees. “Killing all the pending cases will have two effects,” the group argues: depriving consumers’ privacy rights and burying “government misconduct” (PDF). Yet supporters of the administration’s drive for amnesty say the telecom industry worked with the government in good faith and should be protected. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has dubbed legal challenges “frivolous.” Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), says telecoms are being targeted for being patriotic (CBS/AP).
Immunity is not the only sticking point holding up FISA reforms. Some critics and supporters alike agree FISA needs a second look. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), an opponent of the telecom amnesty provision, argues whatever replaces the temporary changes needs to include greater judicial involvement (DailyKos.com) to protect the privacy of innocent Americans. Legal experts at the Heritage Foundation, meanwhile, say a permanent mandate from Congress (PDF) is needed to restore the commander in chief’s “constitutional authority” to gather foreign intelligence without judicial approval. Others favor taking no action. Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, says the Protect America Act was a bad bill and there’s no reason to extend it now (TPM).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 