home > by publication type > daily analysis > Domestic Spy War Intensifies
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A lineman connecting residential phone service in New York. (AP/Mark Lennihan, File)
As the clock runs down on a controversial domestic-spying program, a tangled legal and political battle mounts. President Bush warned Congress during his final State of the Union speech January 28 of dire consequences should the government’s wiretapping of overseas terror suspects be forced into temporary retirement on February 1. “If you don’t act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger,” he said. Lawmakers on January 30 answered the call (WashPost) and approved a fifteen-day extension to amendments of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). But the controversy is unlikely to subside: critics accuse the Bush administration of fearmongering (Salon) to further its spying agenda, and say even if FISA reforms expired without action the president would still be able to conduct surveillance, albeit with court approval.
Among the thorniest unresolved issues is a call to extend retroactive immunity to U.S. companies assisting in electronic monitoring of U.S. citizens. AT&T, Verizon, and other telecom giants each face multibillion dollar lawsuits for their roles in the National Security Agency’s intelligence collection efforts. Vice President Dick Cheney said in a January 2008 address to the Heritage Foundation that amnesty is needed to keep communication companies cooperating with spy agencies. “Without liability protection for past activities to aid the government, the private sector might be extremely reluctant to comply with future requests from the government,” he said. The Democratic-majority House disagrees—they passed an updated FISA bill in November minus the immunity provision—but squabbling continues in the Senate, where lawmakers cannot reach consensus on the amnesty provision.
Temporary changes to FISA adopted in August 2007—as set down in the Protect America Act (PAA)—expand the government’s power to approve international surveillance without court approval, and make warrants unnecessary for monitoring communications of persons “reasonably believed” to be located overseas. Changes in technology mean some foreign-to-foreign communications pass through “switches” on U.S. soil, thus requiring warrants to monitor them; the PAA relaxes that requirement.
Now critics of the legislation are looking for a return to more oversight. A New York Times editorial sees the Bush administration’s efforts to win amnesty for telecoms as a sinister plot of concealment. “The real aim is to make sure the full story of the illegal wiretapping never comes out in court.” The American Civil Liberties Union, in a January 22 letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), agrees. “Killing all the pending cases will have two effects,” the group argues: depriving consumers’ privacy rights and burying “government misconduct” (PDF). Yet supporters of the administration’s drive for amnesty say the telecom industry worked with the government in good faith and should be protected. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has dubbed legal challenges “frivolous.” Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), says telecoms are being targeted for being patriotic (CBS/AP).
Immunity is not the only sticking point holding up FISA reforms. Some critics and supporters alike agree FISA needs a second look. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), an opponent of the telecom amnesty provision, argues whatever replaces the temporary changes needs to include greater judicial involvement (DailyKos.com) to protect the privacy of innocent Americans. Legal experts at the Heritage Foundation, meanwhile, say a permanent mandate from Congress (PDF) is needed to restore the commander in chief’s “constitutional authority” to gather foreign intelligence without judicial approval. Others favor taking no action. Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, says the Protect America Act was a bad bill and there’s no reason to extend it now (TPM).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.