home > by publication type > daily analysis > Divisions Simmer Behind Iran’s Public Face
Email
| Author: |
|---|
An Ahmadinejad supporter shows his colors at a recent rally in the eastern town of Biryand. (Sipa via AP)
In his frequent statements on Iran’s regional ambitions, President Bush often paints in broad strokes. His most recent comments are no exception. “Wherever freedom advances in the Middle East,” the president said during his final State of the Union address on January 28, “it seems the Iranian regime is there to oppose it.” But criticism of Iranian foreign policy leaves aside the country’s internal political dynamics. And in that regard, the Iranian regime is highly complex.
As Iran closes in on March parliamentary elections, the political landscape of what the White House once termed its foremost foreign policy “challenge” is shifting. Iran’s reformists, backed by news of a stumbling economy, are gearing up for potential gains on hard-line conservatives after a drubbing in 2004. The Economist Intelligence Unit notes Iran’s inflation hovers around 19 percent and its annual gross domestic product is forecast to fall in coming years. The grim economic picture has raised doubts about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s economic policies and caused fissures inside conservative camps. The unease could factor in a potential reformist comeback (WSJ) in the 2009 presidential contest.
Even with the country’s growing economic woes, Iran’s reformist candidates are not expected to tip the balance of power in the Majlis, or parliament, on March 14. Over 7,200 candidates registered to run for its 290 seats, but many reformists have already been dumped (RFE/RL) by regional electoral boards, including politicians close to former reformist president Mohammad Khatami (NYT). Similar rejections played prominently in handing control of parliament to conservatives in the 2004 Majlis elections, when roughly 3,600 reformist candidates were disqualified (PDF). Seeking to avoid a repeat, Khatami has reportedly met with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to discuss the dismissals (NRO), but some moderate politicians are still vowing to boycott the vote (LAT). Mehdi Khalaji, an expert in Iranian politics at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, says the fight over the electoral process is fast becoming “one of the country's most sensitive political issues.”
What the political jockeying means for the Iranian public is debatable. Iran enjoys one of the Middle East’s most robust civil societies, due largely to the cultural and academic openness of Khatami’s tenure in the late 1990s. A crackdown on journalists and scholars by the current government has dampened the mood somewhat, but a January 2007 WorldPublicOpinion.org poll (PDF) suggests the majority of Iranians still perceive themselves as living in a country that respects human rights and democratic representation. A separate poll (PDF) conducted in June 2007 is less upbeat; it found widespread support for electoral reforms.
Of course the ultimate arbiter of Iranian policy is the unelected supreme leader, a point CFR Adjunct Senior Fellow Vali R. Nasr argues is often lost (WashPost) on U.S. policymakers. That means it might not matter much who assumes power in Iran’s hard-fought election battles. As Suzanne Maloney of the Brookings Institution and CFR’s Ray Takeyh write in Newsweek, the next U.S. president will face an Iranian regime flush with oil money and indifferent to U.S. threats. Add to the mix a lack of credible intelligence on Iran’s military and political intentions, and dialogue between whoever assumes office—in either capital—may be the best bet for improved bilateral ties.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.