home > by publication type > daily analysis > Tensions Rise in Iraq’s Kurdish North
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Iraqi Kurdish protesters wave Kurdish flags to protest the use of Turkish troops to root out Kurdish rebels. (AP/Yahya Ahmed)
In the summer of 2006, as a wave of sectarian killings spread through central and southern Iraq, leaders in Iraqi Kurdistan were promoting a less violent enterprise: tourism. Dubbed the “Other Iraq” campaign, the Kurdistan Regional Government turned to print ads and television spots (WashPost) to draw visitors and cash to a region it claimed was “already sowing the seeds of a brighter future.” Two years later, violence remains unusual, unless one includes Turkish forays like the recent air strikes (NYT) in the northern Avashin and Hakurk districts. But moves by the regional government to secure the future of Iraqi Kurdistan have stirred new fears among Iraq's other factions.
Disagreements over oil policy, security, and regional governance are threatening to splinter (IWPR) the shaky alliance between Kurdish and Shiite parties in Baghdad. Kurdish officials accuse Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government of stalling a referendum to resolve the status of the disputed city of Kirkuk, and of withholding funding for the region’s military. Sunni and Shiite politicians, meanwhile, are furious over oil-exploration deals inked between the Kurdish government and international companies. Washington Post columnist David Ignatius notes the sparring has reached such a frenzied state some Kurdish leaders are pushing for Maliki to be replaced.
Politically speaking, the rift could have a dramatic impact on Iraq’s long-term stability. Kurdish parties, which make up the second-largest political bloc (PDF) in the country, have been stalwart allies of both the United States and Maliki. The Kurds operated a semiautonomous government in Iraq for years before the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, earning a political aptitude that brought significant regional autonomy and a seat at the table in drafting Iraq’s constitution. But in recent months Arab politicians have fired back, rallying to check Kurdish ambitions. On January 13 a coalition of 145 Shiite and Sunni lawmakers united in defiance of what they consider Kurdish “overreaching”; unilateral oil deals and control of Kirkuk topped the list of grievances (Gulf Daily). The Iraqi parliament has also failed to ratify (NYT) Iraq’s $48 billion budget for 2008, with some political blocs claiming Kurdish demands for revenue sharing are excessive.
Whether the Kurdish regional government will suffer lasting political or economic damage at the hands of its adversaries is debatable. “There’s a strong feeling that the Kurds have overreached,” says Joost Hiltermann, a Middle East analyst with the International Crisis Group. “They now face real restrictions” (IHT). Mohammad Uthman, a Kurdish parliamentarian, takes a different view (RFE/RL). He says Kurdish leaders will challenge the Sunni-Shiite coalition that was formed in January, though he offers few specifics. Equally unclear is how far Baghdad is willing to take its oil embargo. The Oil Ministry views Kurdish government dealings with foreign companies as illegal, and has cutoff exports to some international firms doing business with the Kurds. But Stratfor, an intelligence analysis website, says the central government would be “shooting itself in the foot” if it went too far in blacklisting countries from buying Iraqi crude. Oil production makes up roughly 90 percent of Iraq’s revenues.
Economics aside, the political infighting may turn out to be a positive development for Maliki, who could emerge the victor of any effort that unites Sunnis and Shiites against the Kurds. But observers also see a potential win for Kurdish ambitions. “Kurdish aspirations and nationalism appear to be strengthening,” notes a December 2007 analysis of Kurdish policy (PDF) by UK-based think tank Chatham House, “and are likely to affect the future development of [Iraq and its neighbors] in significant ways.” Jeffrey Goldberg, writing in the Atlantic Monthly, goes further. “Much blood may be spilled as Kurdistan unhitches itself from Iraq,” he writes, “but independence for Iraq’s Kurds seems, if not immediate, then in due course inevitable.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.