home > by region > europe/russia > southeastern europe > serbia > After Kosovo's Secession
Email
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Kosovo separatists demonstrate in front of the European Union Commission headquarters in Brussels. (AP/Thierry Charlier)
After several false starts, Serbia’s restive province of Kosovo declared independence February 17 (NYT). The declaration marks the end of an era for Kosovo, which erupted in ethnic violence in the late 1990s, prompted a U.S.-led intervention in 1999, and has been a protectorate of the United Nations ever since. It also closes a chapter for the Balkan region, in all likelihood marking the final splintering of what was once the confederation of Yugoslavia.
Yet Kosovo’s secession opens as many questions as it resolves. First there is the matter of Kosovo’s own stability. Kosovo’s ethnic Serb minority, numbering at least 100,000, remain scattered in pockets throughout the province. Some observers fear these communities may yet face violence from Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian majority. Serbia warns that an exodus of Kosovo’s Serbs northwards into Serbia might prompt additional ethnic fighting (Guardian). Further complicating these scenarios is turnover in international oversight of the province. A looming Russian veto threat in the UN Security Council means the United Nations is unlikely to officially recognize Kosovo as independent and must withdraw its mission there. The European Union has readied a replacement mission (Reuters), but questions linger over how smoothly a transfer would take place. For starters, Russia recently questioned the legality (RIA Novosti) of EU or NATO forces operating in an independent Kosovo without explicit authority from the UN Security Council.
The stakes are also high for Serbia. Belgrade recently held presidential elections, with the more moderate of two runoff candidates, Boris Tadic, winning narrowly. Yet nationalist pressures on Tadic remain strong. Analysts say EU offers for fast-track membership in exchange for cooperation on Kosovo seem all but dead in the water, and Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica recently blocked talks on EU-Serbian cooperation (AP). Tadic, for his part, immediately moved to annul (B92) Kosovo’s declaration of independence. The Economist says Kosovo’s break could precipitate the crumbling of Kostunica’s ruling coalition. Should Serbia veer away from Europe, Belgrade might seek to strengthen its economic ties with Russia—a concern for EU ministers (AP) highlighted recently when Belgrade signed an energy pact with the Russian energy giant Gazprom.
Kosovo’s break could also bring broader geopolitical shifts. In a recent CFR.org online debate, Kosovo expert Alan J. Kuperman says U.S. recognition of Kosovo’s independence could establish a dangerous precedent if it encourages other separatist regions to press independence claims. A handful of provinces in former Soviet republics threaten to do this—notably the South Ossetia and Abkhazia regions in Georgia. Russian officials raise this scenario as a warning, though CFR’s Charles Kupchan says Moscow’s more general desire to stand up to the United States and Europe also factors in to its opposition on Kosovo. In either case, Richard C. Holbrooke, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, says disputes over Kosovo threaten to further strain tensions between Washington and the Kremlin. Yet for all the potential pitfalls, many experts urge moving forward. Holbrooke concludes that Western policymakers can still prevent worst-case scenarios and calls for them to adopt a course of “preventative diplomacy.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
CFR offers a variety of email newsletters about up-to-date CFR.org material on what’s happening around the world.
Enter your email address and click 'Go' to subscribe.
CFR Experts are based in CFR’s New York and Washington offices. Each expert's bio page contains his or her contact information, professional and educational history, links to publications and current research, a downloadable one-page biographical narrative, and a high-definition photo.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 