home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S. Scrambles to Remake Pakistan Policy
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Supporters of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's party celebrate the unofficial results of their leader during a rally in Lahore. (AP/Emilio Morenatti)
The unstinting support Washington has lent to Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf throughout the past year of tumult has led to something of a crisis for U.S. policy toward Pakistan. White House officials say they still hope opposition leaders will find a way to work with Musharraf. But CFR Senior Fellow Daniel Markey, himself a former top Bush administration policymaker on South Asia, says “Musharraf is obviously a poison pill” (NYT) and that he may be “fading out.” Markey looks at the choices open to Washington, including strengthening Pakistani institutions, in this Policy Options Paper.
Official results (PDF) from February 18 elections confirming the party of slain opposition leader Benazir Bhutto, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), won the most seats, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s party Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N), could have huge implications for Washington’s efforts along Pakistan’s northern border with Afghanistan, too. U.S. efforts to clamp down on terrorist bases in Pakistani frontier areas hinged on military support from the Pakistani army and security forces. But the winners of the parliamentary elections say they will break from Musharraf’s position and seek talks with the militants (NYT) in the tribal areas. In an interview with CFR.org, Frédéric Grare, a visiting scholar at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, says the defeat of the religious parties in the elections brings “a new chance for the United States to seize this opportunity,” and finally understand the nature of the Pakistani society.
The United States has had a tumultuous relationship with Pakistan, as this new timeline explains, and continues to score low in Pakistani public approval ratings. A poll from the U.S.-based International Republican Institute showed only 9 percent of Pakistanis said their country should cooperate with Washington in its war on terror. A report in the Washington Post, citing U.S. officials, says U.S. forces have been leading unilateral strikes within Pakistan’s borders without permission from Pakistani authorities. The report says such strikes could become more frequent this year, particularly if a power vacuum results from the elections. In January, amid speculation regarding U.S. action in Pakistan’s tribal areas, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates stressed Pakistani sovereignty and added: “We would not do anything without their approval.”
The vote leaves major questions about where the volatile country will veer next. An editorial in Pakistan-based newspaper The News says “the possibility of an unwieldy situation emerging in the aftermath of the February 18 polls remains high.” PPP cochairman Asif Ali Zardari, Bhutto's widower, and Sharif’s PML-N party agreed to form a coalition government (BBC) and have ruled out the inclusion of parties that had been allied with Musharraf. The parties have agreed to reinstate the chief justice, sacked by Musharraf in November, but remain divided on the issue of Musharraf's political future (Dawn). The PPP and PML-N parties combined make up more than half the seats in the parliament, but if they are able to form a coalition with a two-thirds majority, they could take a number of steps against Musharraf, including impeachment.
Failures of the PPP and PML-N to come together in the past make analysts skeptical (Dawn). The Los Angeles Times raises the possibility Musharraf’s party could still get in on a coalition, reinvigorating his claim on remaining in power.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.