home > by publication type > daily analysis > America Votes, and the World is Riveted
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Super Tuesday results being viewed outside a Tokyo electronics store. (AP/Katsumi Kasahara)
The world may or may not be economically “decoupling” from the United States as some have suggested. But it remains heavily invested, emotionally at least, in U.S. presidential politics. From Mexico City to Mumbai, media closely cover the presidential nominating contests as they play out across the United States. There is keen interest in the three front-runners, Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and Republican John McCain, described by Britain’s Independent as an “ All-American cast of characters.” Underlying the spectator-sport enthusiasm is also concern about who will replace George W. Bush at a time when confidence in U.S. leadership on a variety of global topics has plummeted from Europe (PDF) to the Muslim world.
Sports metaphors of a kind not common in U.S. coverage abound in foreign coverage of the party primaries. The Hindu, an Indian daily, evokes a classic cricket match. British scholar Timothy Garton Ash likens it to the World Cup soccer tourney (LAT). McCain’s come-from-behind effort has been a popular story line. But generating the most interest now is the historic struggle between Obama—the most successful black candidate ever—and Clinton—who has advanced farther than any woman candidate—to gain their party’s nod for the presidency. German interest, detailed recently by Spiegel, is typical of the global obsession.
The prospect of presidency for Obama, the son of a Kenyan-born Muslim who spent part of his childhood in Indonesia, has fascinated international observers. East Africans are especially caught up in his candidacy, as President Bush discovered in his recent visit to Tanzania (WashPost), which borders Kenya. An op-ed in the Dubai-based Khaleej Times worries about the pressure Obama faces because of his call for direct negotiations with Iran. Israeli press, meanwhile, closely follow the to and fro over the credibility of Obama’s positions, and advisers, on Israeli-Palestinian issues (Haaretz).
Obama’s primary victories produced a flurry of international analysis about the symbolic importance of his candidacy. French analyst Dominique Moisi says an Obama presidency would result in a “Copernican revolution” for America’s image (DailyStar). The Economist concurs, but cautions that the challenges a President Obama would face would be no less difficult: “[T]he Middle East will not heal, just because a president’s second name is Hussein.”
Symbolism aside, many commentators outside the United States are chiefly interested in their own countries’ stake in the U.S. race. In the midst of the candidates’ debates last fall, Mexican President Felipe Calderon urged calm on the immigration issue, saying the contenders should “stop taking Mexicans as symbolic hostages (BBC) in their speeches and strategies.” Days prior to announcing his resignation as Cuba’s president, Fidel Castro issued a long riposte to McCain (Granma), in response to the senator’s charge on the campaign trail that “a couple of Cubans” took part in the torture of American POWs held with him in Hanoi. “The years of prison and the injuries that you received as a consequence of your attacks on Hanoi do not excuse you from your moral duty to the truth,” Castro wrote.
In China, experts have expressed concern about the human rights and trade policies of the Democratic front-runners (ChiTrib). European foreign policy analyst Francois Heisbourg, meanwhile, cautions that excitement on the continent for a Democratic president should be tempered by the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy post-9/11. “The transatlantic relationship,” he writes, “has ceased to be pivotal for the US: the mission will determine the coalition, militarily, strategically and politically” (FT).
For more international perspectives, subscribe to CFR.org's Daily Opinion Roundup — op-eds, editorials, and commentary from around the world.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.