It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
CFR.org no longer produces the Daily Opinion Roundup. We continue to
offer updates on news around the world through the Daily News Brief
newsletter . CFR's latest analysis is also available via RSS feed.
A selection of op-eds and editorials from the U.S. and around the world. Sign up for the email alert or subscribe to the RSS feed.
North Korean Bonhomie
February 27, 2008
There are mixed views about future of the United States’ relations with North Korea in the light of this week’s visit by the New York Philharmonic orchestra. The Hankyoreh in South Korea says it is clear that the historic concert in Pyongyang will improve relations between Pyongyang and Washington. The Guardian, however, in an editorial, believes the expectation of change created by high-profile events such as these is often unsustainably high. It would be naive to expect that Dvorak or Gershwin alone could open the eyes of North Koreans to the outside world, the paper says. The Financial Times warns that the bonhomie with which this rare cultural encounter is being conducted should not obscure the serious issues that still remain unresolved. Michael Auslin and Christopher Griffin of the American Enterprise Institute comment in the Wall Street Journal more broadly on the United States’ relations with East Asia. They say the easing of political tension between Japan and South Korea could pave the way for a new trilateral security partnership. The Japan Times, in an editorial, comments on relations between the two Koreas in the week the new South Korean president, Lee Myung-Bak, was inaugurated. The paper says North Korea’s supreme leader, Kim Jong-Il, will do his best to force the new president to abandon his harder-line policies toward the North and embrace those of his predecessors.
Also in today’s papers:
Christian Science Monitor
In a commentary on Iran’s diplomatic elite, Nieman Fellow Iason Athanasiadis says that in Tehran, a common reading of December's U.S. National Intelligence Estimate is that it stems from a desperate Bush coming to terms with the knowledge that no external pressure, whether political, economic, or military, can contain Iran.
Daily Star (Lebanon)
In an editorial on America’s relationship with Pakistan, the paper accuses the Bush administration of working behind the scenes to dictate the composition of the next government there, and says he risks the collapse of Pakistan's political process for the sake of his own legacy.
Daily Telegraph
Harry de Quetteville writes from Liechtenstein, currently under pressure over its status as a tax haven, and says that of all its travails, the ongoing tax scandal poses perhaps the most significant challenge to its existence.
Dawn (Pakistan)
In an editorial, Dawn calls on Iran to go slow on its nuclear program, but says it is equally necessary that the IAEA and the West, especially the U.S., make Iran feel that its efforts at cooperation are being appreciated by them.
Financial Times
Joseph Cirincione, soon to become president of the Ploughshares Fund, and Ray Takeyh, a Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, dismiss criticism of Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency as a quixotic bureaucrat. They say he is judiciously achieving the goals that critics seemingly desire – the nuclear disarmament of Iran.
In a commentary on sovereign wealth funds, John Kay writes the investment that Norway, Singapore, and Kuwait have made in global markets is also an investment in global, economic and political stability. We should welcome it if China and Russia make the same commitment, he says.
Simon James of University College, London, says Kosovo’s independence is, on the face of it, a distant but useful precedent for Scotland’s nationalists, but warns that the diplomatic fallout over recognition of the newcomer has ominous implications for the separatists in Edinburgh.
Independent (London)
Columnist Patrick Cockburn says the recent Turkish invasion could destroy a unified Iraq, and comments that Iraqi Kurdistan is becoming like Gaza, where Israel can send in its tanks and helicopters at will.
In an editorial on Cyprus after Sunday’s presidential run-off the Independent says permanent partition is a solution the Greek Cypriots have always abhorred and that political will has been the missing ingredient in Cyprus for many years. That, the paper says, may now be about to change.
Jordan Times
Mehdi Khalaji of the Washington Institute for Near East policy writes that all parties in the dispute over Iran’s nuclear capability need to find a formula to resolve the issue before it again threatens to erupt into conflict.
New York Times
In an editorial, the Times comments on Vladimir Putin’s imminent handover of power but says it fears that little will change as a result. The next American president will have to deal with a Russia that is not only nuclear-armed but increasingly wealthy and increasingly authoritarian, says the paper.
Vuk Jeremic, the foreign minister of Serbia, in an op-ed, denounces Kosovo’s declaration of independence as an illegal act and says recognising this declaration legitimizes the doctrine of imposing solutions to ethnic conflicts.
Times of London
Columnist Daniel Finkelstein asks why the Left still worships Fidel Castro and all his appalling fellow communists.
Chief foreign commentator Bronwen Maddox confesses to a flicker of sympathy for Liechtenstein, the European tax haven now embroiled in a row with Germany and the UK.
Wall Street Journal
Editorial editor Matthew Kaminski looks ahead to Russia’s “foreordained” presidential election this Sunday, saying that Vladimir Putin exudes confidence about his political future, but that his actions betray an insecurity that must come naturally to a man with KGB-honed analytical skills.
In an editorial on Bangkok’s “drug war,” the Journal says that Thailand's military government may be gone, but its war on drug patents is still very much alive.
Washington Post
In an editorial on biofuels, the paper comments on two recent studies that it says reveal that biofuels are not a silver bullet in the battle against global warming, but that, in fact, they could make things worse.
Washington Times
In an editorial, the Times welcomes pressure applied by China on the Sudanese government over Darfur but says that Beijing needs to move beyond rhetoric. Only substantive solutions will end the genocidal crisis and bring peace to Sudan, the paper says.
In a further editorial the Times accuses Democrats in the Senate of defeatism over Iraq, despite what the paper calls the growing evidence that the troop surge is damaging al-Qaeda, and that the Iraqis are making remarkable progress on the political front as well.
Access CFR's high-level on-the-record discussions—with world leaders, U.S. government officials, CEOs, policy analysts, and others—through select videos, audio recordings, and unedited transcripts at the following links:
What is likely to be the most interesting development in international politics over the next decade? All undergraduates are invited to respond in the inaugural Foreign Affairs essay contest.
New Books
In Paradise Beneath Her Feet, Isobel Coleman shows how Muslim women and men are fighting back with progressive interpretations of Islam to support women's rights in a growing movement of Islamic feminism.
In this compelling book, Charles A. Kupchan explores how adversaries can transform enmity into amity, and exposes prevalent myths about the causes of peace.
With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine Israel's adversity-driven culture to offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
Bronwyn E. Bruton takes on one of today's most vexing foreign policy challenges, offering concise analysis and thoughtful recommendations grounded in a realistic assessment of U.S. and international interests and capabilities in Somalia.
James M. Goldgeier takes a sober look at what NATO and its members must do to maintain the alliance's relevance in the face of today's strategic environment.
The report of this bipartisan Task Force makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.