home > by publication type > daily analysis > Iran’s Regional Revolution
Email
| Author: |
|---|
President Ahmadinejad greets Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Baghdad on March 2, 2008. Ahmadinejad is the first Iranian president to visit Iraq in decades. (AP/Ahmad al-Rubaye, Pool)
When President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad arrived in Baghdad March 2 for the first visit by an Iranian head of state since 1979, Iraq’s political delegation greeted him with open arms. Some even offered hugs (ChiTrib). Yet a cold shoulder by the United States may set the post-meeting tone. Washington made no secret of its desire for a quick and quiet visit by Ahmadinejad. Iraqi officials told Newsweek on February 26 the Iranian president would not take part in any talks with coalition leaders; Washington was even less eager to strike up conversation. “I’d refer you to the Iraqi government,” U.S. State Department spokesman Tom Casey said in January when asked about the trip. “Who they have or haven’t invited to visit their country is up to them.”
That may be true, but some analysts say Iraq’s gesture to Ahmadinejad also represents deeper shifts, including rapidly growing regional influence for Tehran. The collapse of Saddam Hussein’s Sunni Baath party five years ago was seen as a political coup (New York Review of Books) for the regional ambitions of Shiite-led Iran. Today Iran’s influence in Iraq extends to Shiite businesses and political parties—cooperation some Iraqi leaders say will be strengthened (PressTV) by bilateral talks.
Just how much influence Iran wields over its former foe is unclear. Iran and Iraq fought a bloody eight-year border war in the 1980s, during which many Iraqi Shiites fled to Iran for cover. U.S. officials believe Iran exerts significant influence over Shiite clerics Muqtada al-Sadr and Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, both of whom command powerful militias. Yet experts disagree (Reuters) on whether Iran’s meddling is meant to destabilizing Iraq or simply to keep Tehran’s options open after the United States exits Iraq. CFR Adjunct Senior Fellow Vali R. Nasr suggests Iran is doing what it can to ensure Sunni Baathists never return to power, while Peter Harling of the International Crisis Group says he sees “no sign that Iran wants to shape Iraq politically.” Iraq’s Sunnis, meanwhile, protested Ahmadinejad’s weekend visit; some said it degraded Iraq’s dignity (NYT).
The Bush administration, meanwhile, continues to lobby for containment of Iran’s regional accession, with some success. Bolstered by a new International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report that raised questions about Iran's nuclear ambitions (PDF), the UN Security Council approved a third round of sanctions (BBC) March 3 aimed at pressuring Tehran to suspend its enrichment of uranium. The New York Times reports the push was led by Europeans and the IAEA, largely because a surprise U.S. intelligence report released in December contradicted previous Bush administration statements on Iran’s nuclear-weapons ambitions. Moscow, which along with Beijing had resisted the sanctions hammer, appears to be warming to the idea. Russia’s envoy to the United Nations has delivered Tehran an ultimatum (Moscow News) to halt enrichment. If they refuse, an editorial in Lebanon’s Daily Star says the fallout “will be the direct result of Iran’s political posturing.”
Yet as much as Washington pushes a policy of isolationism vis-à-vis Tehran, there are signals that Iran will not be contained. Some are symbolic, like Iranian ballistic missile testing or the fact that security for Ahmadinejad’s visit to Iraq was partially enabled by the U.S. military (Stratfor). But other signs are more concrete. Iranian cooperation with Persian Gulf states, for instance, has improved in recent months. Despite sanction threats by the West, including warnings to steer clear of Iran’s banks (NYT), Tehran has also managed to extend economic links with Asia. The Economist Intelligence Unit noted in February 2008 that Iranian trade with South Korea reached $8 billion in 2007, and Chinese firms have increased their purchases of Iranian crude. And as Iason Athanasiadis, a Nieman fellow at Harvard University, writes in the Christian Science Monitor, economic and tactical victories have convinced some in Iran “the time has come for their country to lead the region.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.