home > by publication type > daily analysis > Uncertain Times for U.S.-Pakistan Military Ties
Email
| Author: |
|---|
U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen reviews Pakistani troops at a ceremony in Islamabad. February 2008. (AP/Department of Defense)
The U.S. military appears to be redoubling its efforts to cooperate with Pakistani troops and crack down on terrorist groups in the country’s tribal areas. Reports of suspected U.S. missile strikes (AFP) and newly revealed plans to send American military trainers to work with Pakistani paramilitary forces highlight the new push. The New York Times reports that, in the week before Pakistan’s February 18 parliamentary elections, American officials struck a new deal with President Pervez Musharraf and the new head of Pakistan’s military, General Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani, which grants American forces a freer hand to carry out secret air strikes. The United States believes such a strike killed a senior al-Qaeda commander, Abu Laith al-Libi, in northwest Pakistan last month. Experts say the killing may have helped convince Pakistani authorities to move ahead with further covert operations, while still refusing to allow any overt U.S. involvement or presence of U.S. combat troops in Pakistan.
But now Washington is worried the change of guard in Islamabad may curtail its efforts to act more aggressively against suspected terrorists. Pakistan’s recent election winners have said they want to pursue peace talks with militants (IHT). Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, whose party forms a part of the new parliamentary coalition, asked the United States to clearly define its war on terror (Dawn). U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned Islamabad that talks with the militants have not worked in the past (BBC). Robert Grenier, the former director of the CIA Counterterrorism Center, said in a recent CFR meeting that when it came to things like the operation of Predator drone aircraft, a democratically elected government “will be more zealous in guarding Pakistani sovereignty, or being seen to be guarding Pakistani sovereignty.” Grenier added, however, that the army will “resist micromanagement from any government.”
Pakistan has a long history as a buyer of U.S. military weaponry in its efforts to keep pace with arch-rival India. But since September 2001, the United States has given Pakistan almost $10 billion in aid (PDF) to help fight the “war on terror.” The bulk of that money forms what is called the Coalition Support Funding, a Pentagon program to reimburse Pakistan for its support of U.S.military operations. Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE), speaking at CFR after a recent visit to the region, called for greater accountability by Islamabad regarding the aid money. Others fear the money reinforces the Pakistani military’s tendency to act independently of the nation’s constitution, as Boston University’s Husain Haqqani noted in this testimony (PDF) to the House Armed Services Committee. Both want to see a more serious opening to the new civilian leaders of Pakistan and less reliance on the generals.
In fact, analysts have long questioned both the will and the ability of the Pakistani army and intelligence networks to hunt down the militants. Ashley Tellis, senior associate at Carnegie, argued before Congress in January (PDF) that Pakistan’s army is unlikely to see eye-to-eye with the United States on these issues. For one, Tellis says, the Afghan Taliban remains Pakistan’s best hope for influence across its northern border. “It will be beyond the power of a new civilian government to compel the military to pursue this war if the military believes that it is not in Pakistan’s national interest to do so,” he says. Far better, writes Newsweek’s Fareed Zakaria, would be to deal with the new civilian government, which will inherit the problems of militancy. Says Zakaria: “What democracy could do is make Pakistanis understand that this is their war.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President, experts from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
A selection of Foreign Affairs pieces by and about the preeminent political scientist of the last half century.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 