home > by publication type > daily analysis > Trouble in the Andes
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A Venezuelan soldier sits on an armored vehicle at a routine check point in Las Guardias, Venezuela, some 37 miles from the border with Colombia. (AP/Reinaldo D'Santiago)
At first blush, the Colombian incursion into Ecuador this weekend to kill a top leader of the FARC guerrilla group had nothing to do with Venezuela. Yet every regional fracas in Latin America seems to involve Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and this one is no exception. Chavez was first to condemn the Colombian operation, and did so more heatedly (Economist) than Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa. Both countries have since severed diplomatic relations with Colombia, which has struck back with a series of allegations about Venezuela and Ecuador’s relations with the FARC (NYT). The three-way dispute raises fears of a regional military conflict and highlights the complications of security in the region.
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has aggressively sought to eradicate the FARC, and now claims his neighbors have been offering the group significant financial support as well as safe haven within their territories (Miami Herald), a charge both Venezuela and Ecuador deny. Documents from a rebel laptop seized by the Colombian government indicate ties between Chavez and the FARC, but the nature of those ties is ambiguous (AP). A 2004 report from the International Crisis Group warned that Colombia’s borders were the “weak link” in President Alvaro Uribe’s security strategy, and suggested that unless Colombia forged a joint strategy with Ecuador and Venezuela, it would not be able to resolve its conflict with the FARC. “If anything, Bogota had shown too much forebearance [sic] of its neighbors’ FARC support,” says a Washington Times editorial.
Despite virulent rhetoric from all sides, most analysts concur that a regional war is unlikely. For one, Venezuela’s military capabilities pale in comparison to Colombia’s, thanks to years of counternarcotics support from the United States. Stratfor, an intelligence analysis website, says it is “skeptical” of Venezuela’s ability to sustain forces outside its borders. Significant economic ties among the three countries also make a more serious conflict unlikely, analysts say (LAT). Most believe, however, that tensions will continue for the foreseeable future. Regional defense spending has also been on the rise in the past year, raising some concerns about a Latin American arms race (CSMonitor).
While Colombia trades accusations with Ecuador and Venezuela, the specter of the U.S. policy looms large over the region. The technology Colombia used to target the FARC in Ecuador was funded by Plan Colombia, a $5 billion package meant to counter drug trafficking. Some critics say the aid has gone to fight the FARC instead. “Plan Colombia [has] proved to be far more effective as a counter-insurgency plan than as an anti-drug plan, though it [has] been sold to the American public as the latter,” writes Michael Reid in a new book on Latin America. The Colombian government asserts that eliminating the FARC, which funds much of its activities with drug trafficking, will help curb the country’s narcotics problem.
U.S. response to the current saber-rattling has been restrained. “It is very positive that the Bush administration has chosen not to throw gasoline on the fire by aggressively taking Colombia’s side,” writes Colombia expert Adam Isacson. Some analysts suggest the United States needs to revise its counternarcotics policy in Latin America. Colombian journalist Maria Cristina Caballero writes in Newsweek that unless the next U.S. president alters drug policy toward the region, groups like the FARC will be able to expand their operations. In the newly released 2008 International Narcotics Strategy Report, the State Department singles out Venezuela, noting its lack of cooperation on counternarcotics. A 2006 CFR special report urged the United States to open dialogue with Venezuela on issues such as drug trafficking, while a 2004 CFR report suggested that a regional approach that spurred cooperation among the Andean countries was necessary to tackle the problem successfully.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.