Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Trouble in the Andes
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A Venezuelan soldier sits on an armored vehicle at a routine check point in Las Guardias, Venezuela, some 37 miles from the border with Colombia. (AP/Reinaldo D'Santiago)
At first blush, the Colombian incursion into Ecuador this weekend to kill a top leader of the FARC guerrilla group had nothing to do with Venezuela. Yet every regional fracas in Latin America seems to involve Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and this one is no exception. Chavez was first to condemn the Colombian operation, and did so more heatedly (Economist) than Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa. Both countries have since severed diplomatic relations with Colombia, which has struck back with a series of allegations about Venezuela and Ecuador’s relations with the FARC (NYT). The three-way dispute raises fears of a regional military conflict and highlights the complications of security in the region.
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has aggressively sought to eradicate the FARC, and now claims his neighbors have been offering the group significant financial support as well as safe haven within their territories (Miami Herald), a charge both Venezuela and Ecuador deny. Documents from a rebel laptop seized by the Colombian government indicate ties between Chavez and the FARC, but the nature of those ties is ambiguous (AP). A 2004 report from the International Crisis Group warned that Colombia’s borders were the “weak link” in President Alvaro Uribe’s security strategy, and suggested that unless Colombia forged a joint strategy with Ecuador and Venezuela, it would not be able to resolve its conflict with the FARC. “If anything, Bogota had shown too much forebearance [sic] of its neighbors’ FARC support,” says a Washington Times editorial.
Despite virulent rhetoric from all sides, most analysts concur that a regional war is unlikely. For one, Venezuela’s military capabilities pale in comparison to Colombia’s, thanks to years of counternarcotics support from the United States. Stratfor, an intelligence analysis website, says it is “skeptical” of Venezuela’s ability to sustain forces outside its borders. Significant economic ties among the three countries also make a more serious conflict unlikely, analysts say (LAT). Most believe, however, that tensions will continue for the foreseeable future. Regional defense spending has also been on the rise in the past year, raising some concerns about a Latin American arms race (CSMonitor).
While Colombia trades accusations with Ecuador and Venezuela, the specter of the U.S. policy looms large over the region. The technology Colombia used to target the FARC in Ecuador was funded by Plan Colombia, a $5 billion package meant to counter drug trafficking. Some critics say the aid has gone to fight the FARC instead. “Plan Colombia [has] proved to be far more effective as a counter-insurgency plan than as an anti-drug plan, though it [has] been sold to the American public as the latter,” writes Michael Reid in a new book on Latin America. The Colombian government asserts that eliminating the FARC, which funds much of its activities with drug trafficking, will help curb the country’s narcotics problem.
U.S. response to the current saber-rattling has been restrained. “It is very positive that the Bush administration has chosen not to throw gasoline on the fire by aggressively taking Colombia’s side,” writes Colombia expert Adam Isacson. Some analysts suggest the United States needs to revise its counternarcotics policy in Latin America. Colombian journalist Maria Cristina Caballero writes in Newsweek that unless the next U.S. president alters drug policy toward the region, groups like the FARC will be able to expand their operations. In the newly released 2008 International Narcotics Strategy Report, the State Department singles out Venezuela, noting its lack of cooperation on counternarcotics. A 2006 CFR special report urged the United States to open dialogue with Venezuela on issues such as drug trafficking, while a 2004 CFR report suggested that a regional approach that spurred cooperation among the Andean countries was necessary to tackle the problem successfully.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
