home > by publication type > daily analysis > Ohio, Texas to Clinton, McCain Sweeps
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Election workers unload ballots to be counted from polling places in Cleveland, Ohio. (AP/Jamie-Andrea Yanak)
On a night when Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) completed a political comeback, the action on the Democratic side of March 4’s primaries looked even more dramatic as Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) made a bid for one of her own. Winning a closely fought battle in Texas, as well as the important state of Ohio and a primary in tiny Rhode Island, Clinton reclaimed some momentum after eleven straight losses to Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL). Obama took only one state on Tuesday, Vermont. Noting her campaign had won in most of the largest states which traditionally vote Democratic, Clinton vowed to fight on throughout the primary season (MSNBC) in June.
The gloomy state of the nation’s economy, including the role of free- trade deals, remained foremost in the concerns of voters in the delegate-rich states of Texas and Ohio. McCain swept those states as well as Rhode Island and Vermont to secure the number of delegates needed to make him the presumptive Republican presidential nominee (AP). His main challenger, Mike Huckabee, conceded the race, saying he was committed now to supporting McCain’s candidacy.
Analysts credited Clinton's resurgence with a strategy that included attacks on Obama’s readiness on national security and his sincerity on trade issues. Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times wrote Clinton “seemed to finally figure out how to make her brand of ‘experience’ compete with a mantra of ‘change’” that had spurred Obama. A buoyant Clinton told a victory rally in Ohio again of her qualifications to be commander-in-chief “from day one” (NBC). Obama has continued to challenge Clinton’s claim of superior experience for the presidency and stressed he would press on with a positive campaign centered on the “change in Washington” theme. But analysts have noted he now faces the tough task of pursuing a two-front political struggle against McCain and Clinton, who both have criticized his national-security credentials (WashPost).
Exit polls from Democrats voting March 4 showed deep concern with the nation’s economy. In economically strapped Ohio, eight of ten voters said trade deals on average take jobs away from their state. Roughly six in ten voters in the other three states said the same thing (AP). In the intense campaigning before the Ohio and Texas contests, Clinton and Obama sparred on trade and national security. Their differences centered on credibility, rather than policy matters. In Ohio, for example, Obama charged Clinton was an early champion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). She denied that and countered that Obama had given misleading statements about his opposition to the trade deal, which Ohioans blame for causing the loss of manufacturing jobs (Politico). Analysts like CATO's John T. Griswold point out that over half of Ohio's export earnings come from Canada and Mexico. Yet voters there and in many other states apparently still believe the United States gave away more than it got in return (LAT).
While Clinton’s wins snapped her losing streak and revived hopes of a comeback, some analysts said the calculations on delegates show a very difficult road for the nomination no matter how well she does in the remaining states because of the Democrats’ complicated process for selecting delegates. Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter writes: “No matter how you cut it, Obama will almost certainly end the primaries with a pledged-delegate lead, courtesy of all those landslides in February.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.