home > by publication type > daily analysis > China’s Land Reform Challenge
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A protester is dragged away from an industrial park, the site of a 2006 land dispute. (AP/CHINA OUT)
China’s constitution lays down the principle of collective ownership of land as the basis for its socialist economic system. But thousands of farmers, in direct violation of this principle, are demanding privatization of rural land (CSMonitor) and are unilaterally dividing up collective holdings among themselves.
Pressure for reform surfaced two months ago when thousands of farmers in the northeastern province of Heilongjiang decided to reclaim the land taken from them by local officials for sale to private agricultural companies. The protest that started in Heilongjiang spread to other provinces through declarations on the Internet (China Digital Times) and farmers have moved beyond the issue of land seizures to call for private ownership over land.
Discontent among peasants has become one of the major causes for protests in the country. All land in the rural areas is owned by village collectives; each household is allocated a share, which gives land-use rights under thirty-year contracts. To feed China’s economic boom, local officials—usually at the village level—requisition land for sale to manufacturers or property developers. Farmers allege that the process is rife with corruption, with local officials profiting from these development projects and farmers not given adequate compensation.
An analysis in the Financial Times says the Internet declarations were organized at a national level by dissidents comprising journalists, academics, intellectuals, and political activists. They claim their reform movement is set to spread across the country. Though these actions of privatization don’t change anything legally, the movement is posing an important challenge for the government. The leadership responded by cracking down on the farmers (Reuters) and making arrests under charges of “inciting to subvert state power.” Party officials rushed to justify (Xinhua) the policy of collective ownership, citing China’s long feudal history of abuse by landlords. But activists say nothing has changed. Now local officials have become landlords (WashPost) andabuse farmers in the same way.
The movement for private ownership is not without its critics. Wen Tiejun, dean of the school of agriculture and rural development at People’s University in Beijing, told the Financial Times that it is only due to the current system of state ownership that China has “virtually no rural landless poor, in contrast with most large developing countries.” But in a testimony (PDF) to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission in 2006, China expert Joshua Muldavin puts official estimate of landless peasants in China at 70 million, with the number growing by 3 million each year.
China’s Communist party has refused to privatize rural farmlands. However, it paid heed to reform needs in its most recent National Party Congress, during which leaders discussed the idea of permitting farmers to sell land-use rights to other farmers. The government also passed a new property-rights law in 2007. If implemented properly, some experts say it could address farmer grievances and ensure adequate compensation for lost land.
CFR’s Elizabeth C. Economy says getting rid of farms and forests to make way for industry has also resulted in “diminishing crop yields, a loss in biodiversity, and local climatic change.” In a September 2007 Foreign Affairs article she writes that much of China’s arable soil is contaminated, raising concerns about food safety. Loss of arable land to development, desertification, and contamination at a time of spiking food prices and fears of global food shortages could also have consequences for the country’s agricultural productivity. A 2005 survey conducted by the Rural Development Institute, an international nonprofit organization, concluded that secure property rights (PDF) for Chinese farmers would lead to an increase in agricultural investments and productivity and reduce the urban-rural wealth gap.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.