home > by publication type > daily analysis > Trouble in Tibet
Email
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Chinese riot police have fanned out in Tibetan enclaves, including the town of Xiahe, where clashes between monks and security forces have escalated. (AP/Andy Wong)
At the top of the world, there’s trouble afoot. A weeklong conflict between Chinese authorities and Tibetan protestors escalated sharply March 17, with China’s military issuing a mandate (FT) for demonstrators to surrender—or face violent repercussions. Following China’s threat, over one hundred Tibetans turned themselves in (BBC) to police, according to Chinese state media. Chinese troops also moved to seal off the Tibetan capital of Lhasa, blocking movement of people in and out of the city. An eyewitness report from the Economist’s China correspondent paints an ominous scene, with residents of Lhasa too frightened to emerge from their homes. Reuters reports conflicts between protestors and Chinese military may have already resulted in as many as eighty deaths. The protests mark the largest uprising in Tibet in nearly two decades, threaten to incite political tension in neighboring India, and could potentially complicate China’s political situation ahead of the 2008 Olympic Games.
Protests began in the autonomous Himalayan province of China on March 10 with Buddhist monks staging demonstrations in support of Tibetan independence. The BBC notes that the Chinese media has generally shied away from the story. The Chinese state-run news agency Xinhua quotes one Tibetan government official saying secessionist efforts in the region are “doomed to fail” and encouraging Tibetans to refrain from further protests. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao blamed the Dalai Lama (Xinhua), a leading proponent of Tibetan independence, for the unrest. The Dalai Lama rejected the accusations and threatened to resign (ChiTrib) as head of the Tibetan government-in-exile if the violence did not subside. In an interview with Newsweek, he talks about the increasing dissatisfaction of the Tibetans and says “real autonomy” can restore their trust. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice expressed concern over continuing violence and encouraged the Chinese government to engage in a dialogue with the Dalai Lama directly or through his representatives.
Tensions between China and Tibet have persisted since China claimed control of the territory in 1959. Tibetans historically enjoyed long periods of independent rule, as outlined in this analysis (PDF) from the East-West Center Washington, a research organization. Many say they remain loyal to the Dalai Lamas, the traditional magistrates of the region. Analysts say the current uprising could also spotlight tensions between China and India, where the Dalai Lama has been in exile since 1959. Pranab Mukherjee, India’s foreign minister, said India would hold firm (Business Standard) on its position not to allow Tibetan sympathizers in India to cross the India-Tibet border into Tibet, for reasons of maintaining regional stability. The Times of India reports the issue has also stirred internal tensions in New Delhi, with several opposition parties calling for more forceful action from the Indian government.
The protests also seem likely to emerge as yet another thorn in China’s side as its officials attempt to keep a tight rein on domestic problems in advance of this summer’s Olympic Games in Beijing. Critics are demanding a laundry list of reforms from China on issues ranging from domestic repression to the crisis in Sudan’s Darfur region. The BBC reports that the turmoil over Tibet only exacerbates China’s frustration about the international criticisms it has drawn in the run-up to the games. A recent poll of some western and Asian countries found widespread criticism of Chinese policy toward Tibet. According to the poll, which was conducted before the recent protests, 74 percent of U.S. respondents believe China should allow Tibet to have autonomy, to preserve its traditional culture, and to allow the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet.
Meanwhile, many editorial writers have seized on the Tibet protests as a chance to air further complaints about China. An op-ed from the Indian agency Rediff says China “dishonors the Olympic spirit” with its doings in Tibet. A piece from the British paper the Guardian calls on policymakers to use the Olympics to pressure China not to use violence in Tibet. An op-ed in the Christian Science Monitor, meanwhile, lambasts Beijing for its political involvement in various political hotspots—Darfur, Burma, Iran—and also pressures U.S. officials to use the Olympics games as a lever of political influence.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.