home > by publication type > daily analysis > Conservative Conundrum in Iran
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A cleric casts his vote for the Iranian parliamentary elections in Qum, south of Tehran, on March 14. (AP/Kamran Jebreili)
Polls were barely closed when Brussels fired the first shot condemning Iran’s March 14 parliamentary elections. The U.S. State Department waited only a little longer in seconding EU concerns. The counter-strikes were equally swift on the Iranian side: the country’s Supreme Leader issued a statement heralding conservative victories as a blow to Iran’s “enemies” (Telegraph), while Mohammad-Ali Hosseini, a spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, dismissed criticism as “hasty prejudgment” (Press TV).
Missing from the high-profile war of words were answers to a vital question: who won? Like many things inside Iran, a lack of transparency in the voting process makes that a hard question to answer. On paper the spoils went to the establishment. Conservative candidates close to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad control about two thirds of the 190 races settled so far (Fars), putting conservatives on track to control roughly the same majority of the 290 seat-parliament as held in the current government (RFE/RL). Conservatives won a majority of seats from districts inside Tehran, normally considered a reformist stronghold, and reformists are protesting the results (NYT). All told, reformist candidates are expected to win as many as 50 seats once second-round runoffs are completed in coming weeks. Independent and minority candidates will fill out of the chamber.
But conservatives’ strong showing may not mean a continuation of the status quo. Some observers say voters opted for conservative candidates directly opposed to the economic policies of President Ahmadinejad, who could face a tough reelection battle in 2009. A number of the president’s rivals won seats, including the country’s former chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, and Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel, speaker of the current parliament. Kassam Kasir, a political correspondent for Al-Arab newspaper in Qatar, says the election results illustrate the electorate’s deep displeasure (VOA) with Iran’s economic fortunes. (The Economist Intelligence Unit notes Iran’s inflation hovers around 19 percent and its annual gross domestic product is forecast to fall.)
The disqualification of as many as 1,700 reformist candidates was also closely scrutinized, and prompted some moderates to threaten a boycott of the vote (LAT). Kasra Noori, an Iranian journalist and one of many moderates banned from running, tells Newsweek he was tossed for a lack of commitment to Islam. “As far as I know I’m a good Muslim, and it seems that I’m also enjoying a relatively good reputation in public,” he said.
Though reformists from districts outside of Tehran (TIME) are poised to pick up seats, the overall results disappointed many. Reformist voters who supported previous reform candidates say they have grown tired of supporting a movement that has little political sway within Tehran’s clerical hierarchy. “I support [former President Mohammad] Khatami, but what is the point of voting in an election when the result is known in advance?” one voter told The Guardian newspaper during a recent campaign rally south of Tehran. “Even when Khatami was president, he was not allowed to do anything. So why would I vote?” Supporters of conservative candidates, meanwhile, cherished their victory. “If the parliament and president are the same [party], the country will progress,” Rana Sheidaiee, whose family backed hard-line candidates, told the Christian Science Monitor. “When they are different, energy is wasted on internal fighting.”
Yet many other questions remain unanswered. For one, who voted? Some estimates put turnout at 60 percent, a healthy showing despite widespread disqualifications. But reports of polling varied widely. Farideh Farhi, an expert in Iranian politics at the University of Hawaii, says she is “a bit skeptical” of official turnout figures. Quoting official sources, TIME reports roughly 1 million fewer Iranians cast ballots this year compared to 2004. Arguably a more pressing unknown is how effective conservative lawmakers will be in challenging Ahmadinejad’s mandates. Larijani says the new parliament will be “much more effective than the current one, and give priority to national interests” (RFE/RL). But in an interview with CFR.org, Farhi says change will depend on who leads parliament, “and whether or not the leadership of the parliament is willing to challenge Ahmadinejad on those issues more than they have been willing to do in the past.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.