home > by publication type > essential documents > Medellín v. Texas, Supreme Court Decision
Email
Published March 25, 2008
In this case the Supreme Court decided that international treaties are commitments, not binding domestic law. Congress has the power to implement such treaties by enacting statutes to implement them if the treaties are not "self-executing". It also decided that decisions made in international tribunals and the International Court of Justice are also not binding domestic law; specifically, the U.N. Charter, ICJ Statute, and the Optional Protocol were neither self-executing nor had they been implemented by Congress. Finally, the Court decided that without Constitutional authority or Congress' approval the President does not have the power to settle international disputes by means of enforcing international treaties.
The Court argued the case on October 10, 2007; it was decided on March 25, 2008.
Essential Documents are vital primary sources underpinning the foreign policy debate.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.