Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Showdown on Trade
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A Colombian worker packs roses for shipping. Colombia is a leading exporter of roses to the United States. (AP/Fernando Vergara)
Free trade has emerged as a political football in the U.S. presidential campaign, and a proposed treaty with Colombia, recently sent to Congress by President Bush, now seems up for grabs. The deal, agreed on in 2006, aims to lift tariffs on the vast majority of goods traded between the United States and Colombia, one of the strongest U.S. allies in Latin America and a major recipient of U.S. aid. Congressional Democrats immediately moved to sideline the deal (WashPost). House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she won’t bring it to the House floor unless Bush meets Democratic demands for greater relief for victims of the current mortgage and credit crises, adding that without further concessions the deal would be voted down in the House either way. The move drew ire from the administration—and Colombia—and spotlights deep discontentment about trade that promises to reverberate through the November presidential vote and beyond.
The Colombia free trade agreement isn’t the only such deal pending congressional approval. Trade pacts with Panama and South Korea also hang in the wings, and economists have long hoped for a multilateral deal through the Doha round of World Trade Organization talks. But recent economic turmoil and job losses in the United States (Bloomberg) have led many politicians and voters to raise questions about free trade pacts. NAFTA, the North American trade bloc, has come in for particular criticism. The Colombia, Panama, and South Korea deals—which are negotiated but awaiting ratification debates—appear under threat. While Democrats agreed to ratify a trade promotion deal with Peru in 2007, election-year concerns and a bad economy have led to demands for heightened assurances on labor and environmental standards, as well as domestic economic-stimulus measures. On the presidential hustings, CFR.org’s candidate issue tracker on trade shows Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) vying to ride the anti-free trade wave.
The Wall Street Journal, generally a free trade advocate, argues in an editorial that U.S. trade unions rely on flawed logic when they say killing the deal would protect U.S. workers. The Journal contends the deal would weaken the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers and put some of the best-paying union jobs at risk. Duties on Colombian goods coming into the United States are already quite low, so the main upshot of killing the Colombia agreement would be to limit U.S. exports. But among the U.S. electorate, polls show anti-free trade arguments gaining credence. One analyst argues in Foreign Policy in Focus that this sentiment may stem from U.S. concerns about losing the global economic preeminence it has enjoyed since World War II.
Experts say domestic trade politics could bring very real diplomatic consequences. Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe recently lashed out at Barack Obama (AP) for his statements on the Colombia deal. Nor has Washington ’s skittishness about the Colombia deal been lost on other potential trade partners. South Korea’s Chosun Ilbo comments that unfriendly U.S. trade winds could derail the pending deal between Washington and Seoul, frustrating South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who is intently focused on expanding trade. In a CFR Critical Policy Choices report, trade expert Daniel W. Drezner notes every time the United States has signed a bilateral free trade agreement, its relations with that country have improved markedly.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
