home > by publication type > daily analysis > Showdown on Trade
Email
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
A Colombian worker packs roses for shipping. Colombia is a leading exporter of roses to the United States. (AP/Fernando Vergara)
Free trade has emerged as a political football in the U.S. presidential campaign, and a proposed treaty with Colombia, recently sent to Congress by President Bush, now seems up for grabs. The deal, agreed on in 2006, aims to lift tariffs on the vast majority of goods traded between the United States and Colombia, one of the strongest U.S. allies in Latin America and a major recipient of U.S. aid. Congressional Democrats immediately moved to sideline the deal (WashPost). House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she won’t bring it to the House floor unless Bush meets Democratic demands for greater relief for victims of the current mortgage and credit crises, adding that without further concessions the deal would be voted down in the House either way. The move drew ire from the administration—and Colombia—and spotlights deep discontentment about trade that promises to reverberate through the November presidential vote and beyond.
The Colombia free trade agreement isn’t the only such deal pending congressional approval. Trade pacts with Panama and South Korea also hang in the wings, and economists have long hoped for a multilateral deal through the Doha round of World Trade Organization talks. But recent economic turmoil and job losses in the United States (Bloomberg) have led many politicians and voters to raise questions about free trade pacts. NAFTA, the North American trade bloc, has come in for particular criticism. The Colombia, Panama, and South Korea deals—which are negotiated but awaiting ratification debates—appear under threat. While Democrats agreed to ratify a trade promotion deal with Peru in 2007, election-year concerns and a bad economy have led to demands for heightened assurances on labor and environmental standards, as well as domestic economic-stimulus measures. On the presidential hustings, CFR.org’s candidate issue tracker on trade shows Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) vying to ride the anti-free trade wave.
The Wall Street Journal, generally a free trade advocate, argues in an editorial that U.S. trade unions rely on flawed logic when they say killing the deal would protect U.S. workers. The Journal contends the deal would weaken the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers and put some of the best-paying union jobs at risk. Duties on Colombian goods coming into the United States are already quite low, so the main upshot of killing the Colombia agreement would be to limit U.S. exports. But among the U.S. electorate, polls show anti-free trade arguments gaining credence. One analyst argues in Foreign Policy in Focus that this sentiment may stem from U.S. concerns about losing the global economic preeminence it has enjoyed since World War II.
Experts say domestic trade politics could bring very real diplomatic consequences. Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe recently lashed out at Barack Obama (AP) for his statements on the Colombia deal. Nor has Washington ’s skittishness about the Colombia deal been lost on other potential trade partners. South Korea’s Chosun Ilbo comments that unfriendly U.S. trade winds could derail the pending deal between Washington and Seoul, frustrating South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who is intently focused on expanding trade. In a CFR Critical Policy Choices report, trade expert Daniel W. Drezner notes every time the United States has signed a bilateral free trade agreement, its relations with that country have improved markedly.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.