home > by publication type > daily analysis > Another New Tack on North Korea
Email
| Author: |
|---|
North Korean workers at Yongbyon nuclear complex which was shut down in July 2007. (Kyodo via AP Images)
After months of deadlock and countless rounds of diplomacy, experts say the United States has reached a new compromise (FT) with the North Korean regime on denuclearization. Washington denies this lets North Korea off the hook on its secret uranium-enrichment program and its proliferation of nuclear technology to Syria. But the shift brought criticism raining down upon the Bush administration from quarters once very much in step with U.S. policy toward the nuclear-armed Stalinist dictatorship. In particular, John R. Bolton, who shaped administration thinking on the issue for much of the president’s tenure, contended in the Wall Street Journal recently that Washington had capitulated to Pyongyang. Bolton ended his missive with this line: “President Bush, you are no Ronald Reagan.”
The criticism grew louder after U.S. intelligence officials briefed members of Congress Thursday that North Korea had helped Syria (LAT) build a nuclear reactor which was destroyed by an Israeli air strike last year. In a background briefing, senior intelligence officials said they hoped this disclosure of North Korea’s proliferation to Syria will strengthen the position of U.S. negotiators in the ongoing Six-Party Talks. Pyongyang failed to meet its January 1, 2008, deadline to fully disclose its nuclear activities as called for under the Six-Party Talks. But now, experts and media reports suggest, under the new deal North Korea will only have to declare its past plutonium production. In exchange, the United States will take North Korea off the list of state sponsors of terrorism and remove some of the sanctions imposed on the country under the Trading with the Enemy Act. A January 2008 Congressional Research Service report examines three possible policy options (PDF) for the Bush administration to proceed with North Korea’s removal from the terrorism list.
President Bush denied making concessions. Instead he argues that the United States, along with the other participants in the talks, will wait for Pyongyang to make a full verifiable declaration before they move to fulfill their obligations toward North Korea. However, CFR’s Gary Samore tells CFR.org that the Bush administration made the compromise in order to move to the next phase in the talks—negotiating the actual elimination of North Korea’s nuclear weapons. But he says: “I am skeptical that the North Koreans will actually carry out that commitment.” There are also concerns that North Korea will underreport its plutonium production and that negotiators might hit another deadlock over actual verfication of the production facilities.
This possible softening of the U.S. stance has come as Japan and South Korea appear to be getting tough with Pyongyang. Japan recently extended the economic sanctions (BBC) it imposed on North Korea after its nuclear test in October 2006. And South Korea’s new president, Lee Myung-bak, has said that future aid will be linked to progress in the denuclearization process. In his visit to the United States last week, Lee stressed the importance of a complete declaration by North Korea.
There is also concern that the talks have failed to address other pressing issues regarding North Korea. CFR’s Michael J. Gerson writes in the Washington Post,“The price we are paying to pursue those talks is silence about the suffering of a brutalized, friendless people.” The United Nations’ World Food Program has warned of a looming humanitarian crisis: More than 6. 5 million out of the total population of 23 million in North Korea do not have enough to eat. This situation is made worse by a rise in tensions between the North and the South; Seoul has not yet delivered (IHT) its annual food assistance to the North. Columnist Christopher Hitchens writes in World Affairs that because the world will not allow North Korean civilians to starve, “Pyongyang despotism therefore has a vested interest in prolonging the stalemate.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
