home > by publication type > daily analysis > Still a Dangerous Border
Email
| Author: |
|---|
A U.S. soldier frisks an Afghan man near the Pakistani border in February 2007. (AP/Rafiq Maqbool)
The latest spike in cross-border attacks (NYT) into Afghanistan by militants based in Pakistan has once again exposed the vulnerabilities of those fighting the war for a stable Afghanistan. In a repeat of past instances, Afghan officials blamed (IHT) the recent assassination attempt against Afghan President Hamid Karzai on insurgents in Pakistan’s tribal areas with links to al-Qaeda. A spokesperson from Pakistan’s army denied (Daily Times) the allegations. But all recent U.S. intelligence and investigative reports have pointed to the growing strength of the terrorist groups in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) along the Afghan border.“Using the sanctuary in the border area of Pakistan, al-Qaeda has been able to maintain a cadre of skilled lieutenants capable of directing the organization’s operations around the world,” said the 2008 Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence.
President Karzai has called for these sanctuaries in Pakistan to be closed off. “The war against terrorism is not in Afghan villages, the war against terrorism is elsewhere, and that’s where the war should go,” he told the New York Times. Last year was Afghanistan’s bloodiest year since 2001, when the U.S.-led forces entered the country. A number of policy experts in the United States, including the leading Democratic presidential candidates, have called for more troops in Afghanistan to fight the insurgency, but some experts are skeptical that greater numbers will be more effective. “No matter how many more troops you add into Afghanistan, you won’t really be able to get at the root of the problem” (PBS), says Barnett Rubin of New York University. Rubin says more troops cannot affect the regional situation, which gives the Taliban sanctuary in Pakistan.
Increased instability, in part due to a growing terrorist presence in the tribal lands, has also led to an increase in violence within the rest of Pakistan. Russ Travers, deputy director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, said terrorist attacks in Pakistan doubled from 2006 to 2007, and the number of deaths and injuries in these attacks quadrupled.
Washington is skeptical (RFE/RL) of the Pakistani government’s strategy of pursuing peace deals with the militants in the tribal areas. The accord under consideration calls for an end to militant activity and an exchange of prisoners in return for the gradual withdrawal of the Pakistani military from part of the tribal areas. The troop withdrawal clause is problematic for the Pakistani government, as well as the United States, and experts say it has led to a stalemate in negotiations. Analysts note that the prospective deal is limited (NPR); while it seeks to stop Taliban attacks against the Pakistani forces, it does not stop the militants from crossing the border and targeting NATO forces in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, the Bush administration faces increasing scrutiny on its Pakistan policy. An April 2008 report by the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of U.S. Congress, said the United States lacked a comprehensive plan to destroy the terrorist threat in Pakistan’s border region.
Several Pakistan experts and U.S. officials have pointed to the failure of past peace deals to argue against the ongoing talks. But, in a Washington Post op-ed, Pakistan’s new Prime Minister, Yousaf Raza Gillani, called these comparisons “erroneous.” Newsweek columnist Michael Hirsh argues the Bush administration should embrace Islamabad’s post-Musharraf strategy. He writes that the new Pakistani government is betting on what U.S. officials would identify as a classic counterinsurgency strategy—one they have adopted for Sunni insurgects in Iraq: “deploying the military while winning hearts and minds by pouring aid into the tribal regions where extremists hide out.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.