Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > A War of Words with Iran
| Author: |
|---|
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad met in Iraq in March amidst U.S. accusations of Iranian meddling. (AP/Hadi Mizban)
Accusations regularly fly between Washington and Tehran about their involvement in Iraq, but the past few weeks have seen these charges take a more specific turn. The U.S. military in recent weeks has accused Iran of arming Shiite militias inside the war zone. What’s more, an unnamed U.S. official told the New York Times that Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based terrorist group, has been training Iraqi fighters at a base near Tehran. The government of Iran, meanwhile, has pulled out of a fourth round of bilateral talks over Iraqi security to protest what Tehran calls the “massacre” (aj-Jazeera) of innocent civilians in Iraq by U.S.-led forces. The Pentagon says it is only bombing fighters suspected of receiving Iranian backing.
Caught in the middle of the diplomatic fracas is Iraq’s Shiite-led government. After months of mounting U.S. claims of Iranian interference, a delegation of Iraqi lawmakers traveled to Tehran to discuss new evidence (Reuters) said to implicate Iran in cross-border meddling. The alleged links, amassed by the U.S. military but so far classified, are said to include proof Iranian manufactured weapons are being used to kill U.S. and Iraqi soldiers. A military official told CFR.org on background last month recent weapons caches uncovered include rockets with serial numbers traceable to Iran. Charges of Hezbollah-staffed training camps, in particular, have some urging action: John Bolton, the former U.S. ambassador to the UN, says any camp harboring militants should be targeted by “military force” (Telegraph) to show the Iranians “we’re not going to tolerate this.” But mixed messages from the Iraqi delegation highlights Baghdad’s balancing act in juggling relations with competing powers (LAT). Ali al-Dabbagh, an Iraqi government spokesman, was quoted by an Iranian news agency as suggesting claims of Iranian interference were “speculation” (Fars). Dabbagh later told reporters he was misinterpreted, and said Iraq is forming a committee to investigate allegations of interference (Armed Forces Press Service).
For the United States, pointing a finger at Iran is seen by some analysts as an attempt to rally support for Iraqi government forces at a crucial moment. The government this year has challenged militias loyal to firebrand cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and reports from one Baghdad neighborhood suggest popular support for his Madhi army—which the U.S. alleges receives Iranian aid—may be slipping (Longwarjournal.com). Residents of Sadr City, the 2.5 million Baghdad slum that is a base of Sadr support, are fleeing escalating violence there (NPR). The U.S. and Iraqi governments also seek to isolate Sadr, the Shiite Iraqi cleric who is thought to be studying in the Iranian religious city of Qom. The cleric refused to meet (RFE/RL) with the Iraqi delegation during their visit last week.
Some experts speculate Iran wants to ensure a Sunni-led government never returns to power in Iraq. Others suggest Iran favors a kind of managed chaos in Iraq, to keep the U.S. military busy. But lackluster U.S. intelligence on Iran makes some of this a guessing game. As Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution writes in the Nation, “Iran is putting money on every number of the roulette wheel.” Complicating matters are ties between Iran and Iraq’s Shiite politicians, many of whom spent the Hussein era in Iran (PDF).
Despite Iranian vows to halt bilateral security talks, some channels remain open. Senior U.S. officials in Baghdad have received back-door communications from Tehran (WSJ) in the recent past. An International Crisis Group report suggests such negotiations be brought to the front door (PDF). The report concludes that lasting stability will require “engaging in real diplomacy with all Iraq’s neighbors, Iran and Syria included.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
