home > by publication type > daily analysis > Where Farm Policy Meets the Food Crisis
Email
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
A farmer works in a rapeseed field near the Kiel Canal in northern Germany. (AP/Heribert Proepper)
Farmers in the United States and European Union will be watching more than the weather this summer. New legislation pending on both sides of the Atlantic holds significant implications for the future of agriculture markets, international trade policy, and the food crisis that continues to grip large swaths of the developing world.
At first blush, Europe's efforts seem broader than Washington's. On May 20, the European Commission presented a proposal (VOA) that would do away with decades-old rules capping domestic agricultural production, while simultaneously overhauling how European governments dole out subsidies to farmers. This could mean an end to the practice where farmers are paid to leave land fallow, which economists say represents a major market distortion. The legislation might also attempt to cajole farmers into greener behavior (Telegraph) by eliminating subsidies for farmers who refuse to adopt ecologically friendly reforms such as limiting pesticide use. To pass, however, the bill must gain approval from all EU member states, and that could be a tall order.
In the United States, Congress recently forged its own comprehensive agriculture legislation, though economists didn't much like the results. The Economist lambastes the new U.S. Farm Bill, which required Congress to override President Bush's veto. Despite an effort to cut back on subsidies to the wealthiest U.S. farmers, the article says a Byzantine system of handouts and insurance benefits mean only households making over $1.5 million a year will see any reduction to their subsidies—and even those restrictions can be avoided through loopholes. Several countries at recent World Trade Organization meetings slammed the legislation (Reuters). CFR's Sebastian Mallaby says Washington's policies have aggravated the global food crisis—"not for the first time in Washington do the fat welfare queens of the farm lobby trample on the poorest people in the world," he writes.
For this dynamic to be amended, experts say structural adjustments to U.S. food aid policy will be necessary. President Bush proposed earlier this year that the U.S. farm bill should require the United States to purchase a quarter of its food handouts overseas, a plan aimed at making food donations cheaper and more plentiful, and at bolstering local agriculture markets in the developing world. Congress acknowledged this line of reasoning by authorizing the purchase of $60 million worth of local food (USNews), but critics say that's a drop in the bucket, given the scope of the global food crisis. Many economists hope future iterations of the U.S. farm bill will allow for a much larger percentage of U.S. foreign food aid to be bought overseas.
It's hard to overstate the stakes. The Financial Times' Martin Wolf reckons no sector is as grossly distorted by subsidies and protectionist policy as agriculture. The promise of a multilateral trade deal from the Doha round of trade talks does not seem to have provided incentive for policy change. The food crisis, on the other hand, just might. The run-up in food prices stands out not just as a humanitarian crisis, but potentially a security matter as well. An interactive map shows civil unrest bubbling in dozens of countries pinched for food supplies—including energy providers like Mexico and Uzbekistan and some important commodity exporters in Africa.
Experts say major revisions to U.S. food aid policy or the EU's Common Agricultural Policy—if legislators can muster the will to pass them—will play an important role in alleviating these problems. Wolf puts trade and other policy interventions alongside humanitarian aid and productivity gains as the three critical elements to solving the food crisis. In a new working paper, CFR's Laurie Garrett says the focus should fall squarely on structural reforms to agricultural policy, without which broader issues like rising energy costs due to ethanol subsidies will remain unaddressed. With a U.S. presidential election on the horizon, many observers hope more lasting policy change could be afoot. If Europe's leaders push through their proposed subsidy cuts in Brussels, they would set a meaningful example.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.