home > by publication type > daily analysis > Sudan's Interlocking Crises
Email
| Author: | Stephanie Hanson |
|---|
Looters roam the village of Abyei, Sudan, while a fire rages in some of the huts on May 23, 2008. (AP/Sarah El Deeb)
Sudanese government troops and southern Sudanese forces have led a tense coexistence for months in the oil-rich area of Abyei, which straddles Sudan's north and south. Accounts of what ignited the recent fighting (Economist) between the two groups differ, but no one disputes the end result: a town destroyed (WashPost), roughly one hundred thousand people displaced, and the probability of civil war on the rise with each passing day. Abyei exemplifies the most contentious elements of a 2005 peace deal between north and south Sudan. Analysts say the town's future is critical to the viability of that agreement, and by extension, prospects for a resolution to the crisis in Darfur.
The 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended a decades-long civil war between north and south Sudan includes a separate protocol for Abyei. Both sides claim the area, which grossed about $670 million in oil revenues in 2006. A portion of the area's oil revenue is supposed to go directly to residents of Abyei, but there were concerns at the time of the agreement about how the money was being shared. The Abyei protocol gives the area a special administrative status, delineates a process to determine its boundaries, and calls for a referendum in 2011 to determine if the area will be part of the north or the south. That referendum is scheduled to coincide with a referendum on whether south Sudan will secede from the north. Experts say Sudan's ruling National Congress Party seeks to avoid secession at all costs, but it is also trying to arrange the north-south border so that it retains as many oilfields as possible in the north.
The turmoil in Abyei comes at a time of shifting U.S. policy toward Sudan. According to the State Department, U.S. policy emphasizes ending the violence in Darfur, providing humanitarian assistance, and pushing for full implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). There has been little movement on these points in recent months, yet there are signs Washington is pursuing normalization talks with Sudan, which remains on the state sponsors of terror list. U.S. Special Envoy Richard Williamson plans to meet with Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir in the next several weeks (WashPost). Though some experts advocate such engagement, human rights groups and some policymakers criticize Washington for not taking a harder line.
Other experts say the United States has focused its Sudan policy on Darfur to the detriment of the north-south agreement. For the past three years, U.S. policy toward Sudan has focused on the crisis in Darfur, where clashes between Arab janjaweed militias and Darfur rebel groups have displaced millions and left hundreds of thousands dead. While the United States has pressed for the deployment of a robust peacekeeping force to the region, regional analysts are calling for more U.S. attention on seeing through implementation of the CPA. In fact, Khartoum has played Darfur and the north-south conflict against one another (PDF), argues a report from the Center for America Progress' ENOUGH project. "International policies must no longer be bifurcated between the CPA and Darfur," warns the International Crisis Group. "Sudan's multiple conflicts are outgrowths of a common set of national problems and need to be treated as such."
Much will depend on the willingness of the National Congress Party and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), the dominant party of south Sudan, to negotiate. The SPLM suspended its participation in talks with Khartoum and the United States this week, citing the recent violence in Abyei (VOA). Though experts say the National Congress Party is skilled at survival, some see signs of weakness. Andrew Natsios, former U.S. special envoy to Sudan, writes in a recent Foreign Affairs essay that the ruling party has developed a "siege mentality." If fighting escalates between the north and south, he writes, "the war would come to Khartoum very quickly."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.