home > by publication type > daily analysis > Israel, the West, and a Nuclear Iran
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the Natanz Uranium Enrichment Facility in April. (AP/Iranian President's Office)
After months of speculation about a U.S. military showdown with Iran over its disputed nuclear program, attention has turned to another state at odds with Tehran: Israel. Western media is abuzz with predictions of an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear installations. Former Bush administration official John Bolton went so far as to predict the timing (Telegraph)—during the U.S. presidential transition after November's elections. Israeli military exercises over the Mediterranean have only added to the tension (NYT). As the Financial Times notes, while fear of a military answer to the Iranian nuclear question had once given way to hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough, that optimism has now been supplanted by ominous realities.
Washington has long hinted military force may be needed to curtail Tehran's nuclear capabilities. But reactions to a potential Israeli strike from members of the Bush administration have ranged from cautious to critical. During a press briefing on July 2 President Bush avoided a question about whether he would discourage Israel from going after Iran militarily. At a Pentagon briefing the same day, Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, responded to a similar question by stressing that "opening up a third front right now would be extremely stressful on us. That doesn't mean we don't have capacity or reserve, but that would really be very challenging."
Some defense experts believe Iran would respond to an Israeli strike by attacking U.S. and Israeli interests (Ynet) in neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan. An aide to Iran's Supreme Leader reinforced that view on July 8. According to the Iranian Students News Agency, military envoy Ali Shirazi vowed that if Iran is attacked, "Tel Aviv and US fleet in the Persian Gulf would be the first targets to burst into flames." Further heightening tensions, Iran test-fired a series of long- and mid-range missiles on July 9. An Iranian military official said the exercise—dubbed The Great Prophet III—was a warning to the United States and Israel (Press TV).
The new round of tough talk and action comes amid signs of a diplomatic thaw, further clouding the West's course of action. Manuchehr Mottaki, Iran's foreign minister, praised an incentives package presented on behalf of six major powers and declared on July 2 the possibility of "a multi-faceted solution" (AFP) to the nuclear question. Iranian media reports also suggested Tehran might consider suspending uranium enrichment to kick-start negotiations (National). But Iran's own position vis-à-vis suspension remains inconsistent (IRNA). German Chancellor Angela Merkel has warned that the offer to negotiate is not open-ended (Press TV). Washington, meanwhile, continues to pursue non-military tracks while refusing to rule out the use of force. Seymour M. Hersh of the New Yorker writes that the Bush administration has ramped up funding to Iranian opposition groups inside Iran and expanded intelligence-gathering operations across the border.
Analysts see a host of reasons to keep away from full-scale violence. Shlomo Ben-Ami, former Israeli foreign minister, and Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, write in the Christian Science Monitor that bombing runs alone won't destroy "any potential clandestine facilities in Iran nor Iran's knowledge of the enrichment process." Mohamad ElBaradei, the chief UN nuclear inspector, told Al Arabiya television in late June that an attack on Iran would "turn the region into a fireball" (Reuters). Some commentators, like Yossi Melman of the Israeli daily Haaretz, say Western reporting has "sent a false message" (PostGlobal) that an Israeli strike is imminent.
Patrick Clawson and Michael Eisenstadt of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, meanwhile, say policymakers must think through the political, economic, and diplomatic consequences of a strike. But as the Economist argues, Israel's clock is clearly ticking. "Given their history," the magazine says, "a lot of Israelis will run almost any risk to prevent a state that calls repeatedly for their own state’s destruction from acquiring the wherewithal to bring that end about."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 