home > by publication type > daily analysis > Meltdown Risk, Revisited
Email
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
(Gareth Fuller/PA Wire)
The troubles faced by the U.S. mortgage-lending behemoths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are no small matter. The two lenders hold or guarantee over $5 trillion worth of U.S. mortgages, about half the country’s mortgage market. Should they collapse—an outcome which seemed a real possibility the morning of July 11 when shares of the firms nosedived almost 50 percent—they would sap credit (FT) from the already gummed-up U.S. housing market. This in turn could wreak havoc on real-estate prices, bringing another wave of mortgage defaults, and could spell major trouble for already embattled financial institutions, many of which have invested in mortgage-backed debt.
A scenario in which the U.S. government saves Freddie and Fannie by nationalizing them isn't much rosier (Economist). Such a move would increase the U.S. budget deficit by nearly 50 percent and could prompt a rapid decline in the dollar's valuation against other currencies. The U.S. Treasury, skirting the buyout option, acted to stop the bleeding with a plan that treats the mortgage lenders like banks and gives them access to the Federal Reserve's discount window for emergency loans. President Bush called the plan a temporary measure to stabilize markets, and urged Congress to act quickly to pass it. Fannie and Freddie, meanwhile, quickly seized on provisions that let them offload assets (Forbes) onto the U.S. Federal Reserve. The strategy didn't do much to allay market fears, however, and stocks tumbled globally (FT) in the days following its announcement.
The broader question now is what Fannie's and Freddie's woes might mean for U.S. and global growth. Testifying before Congress on July 15, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave a downbeat assessment, saying a combination of inflation, energy prices, and financial instability will continue to plague economic growth and could spell a further slowdown.
The most urgent concern in the short-term is that falling real estate prices and mortgage defaults—the factors leading to Fannie's and Freddie's woes—could bring down yet more financial institutions. On July 11, the California bank IndyMac (no relation to Freddie) became the seventh U.S. bank to fail since the credit crisis started, and one of the biggest bank failures in U.S. history. The specter of a bank run emerged as customers queued outside branch offices (LAT). With quarterly earnings season well underway and analysts expecting ugly results from financial institutions, news reports indicate Wall Street is increasingly concerned about the possibility of a wave of bank failures (USNews). Such problems would extend well beyond U.S. borders, given the extent to which international banks invested in U.S. debt—not to mention the geopolitical ramifications of a falling dollar.
If there's a silver lining, experts say, it is only that markets have already factored in a lot of financial pain. Some financial analysts are starting to wonder whether, with markets in full freak-out mode, equities may finally be looking more palatable (WSJ). Others have noted that the problems currently faced by financial markets don't necessarily mean (Times of London) underlying economic problems. Rapid economic growth in many parts of the developing world still carries the possibility of mitigating global economic distress—though inflation in many of the same countries (Economist), combined with a more reticent U.S. consumer, could yet undermine this growth. So too could U.S. inflation, which continues to bubble upward in line with gravity-defying oil prices. None of this necessarily foretells a meltdown, economists say. But, as Bernanke said in his July 15 testimony, the present economic environment seems "unusually uncertain."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.