Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > War Resurfaces on the Campaign Trail
| Author: |
|---|
A U.S. Marine during a patrol in the town of Garmser in Helmand province of Afghanistan. (AP/Rafiq Maqbool)
Since the start of the marathon presidential election campaign, the U.S. government has poured thirty-thousand additional troops into Iraq and deployed thousands of new forces in an increasingly difficult war in Afghanistan (PDF). Congress has passed counterterrorism legislation that gives the government sweeping new powers to eavesdrop on civilians. The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has struck down some of the White House's rules for detaining enemy combatants seized since 9/11. Yet for much of the past 18 months, the steady march of grim economic news has commanded more attention (WashPost) than national security.
This summer, however, the presidential campaigns have seized on national security as a dominant issue, offering nearly daily reminders of the importance of resolving two wars. It is no coincidence this resurgence of interest in Afghanistan and Iraq dovetails with the formal start of the general election contest between the presumptive Democratic nominee, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), and presumptive Republican rival Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Since winning his party's primary nomination battle, McCain has emphasized his national security credentials. Obama, meanwhile, recently embarked on his first visit to Iraq and Afghanistan since becoming his party's presumptive candidate. The two candidates have traditionally presented sharply different views on Iraq. Obama stresses he will stick by a plan to withdraw most combat troops within sixteen months of taking office (AP). Earlier, Obama called Afghanistan the "central front" (Face the Nation) in U.S. counterterrorism efforts. McCain has countered that Iraq is the "central battleground in the war in the struggle against al-Qaeda" and says conditions on the ground, not timetables, should dictate the redeployment of U.S. combat forces from Iraq.
The Economist's Democracy in America blog, for instance, notes that on July 18 the White House endorsed "what is essentially a flexible timetable for the withdrawal of American troops." On the same day, McCain's campaign, citing the success of the surge, spoke of the possibility of withdrawal: "A conditions-based withdrawal has always been U.S. policy. [It] has always been something Senator McCain has supported." And while they differ on the manner of deploying more troops in Afghanistan, both candidates support bolstering that mission with thousands of troops while refocusing efforts on training Afghan forces.
On the home front, Obama risked angering part of the Democratic base on July 9 when he cast a vote in favor of legislation overhauling U.S. domestic surveillance practices and granting immunity to telecommunications companies that cooperated with a Bush administration eavesdropping program. Obama called it an imperfect bill (HuffPost) but said "I'm persuaded that it is necessary to keep the American people safe." McCain did not participate in that vote but has backed the legislation.
It remains to be seen how all of this will register with American voters, who are still coming to grips with $4-a-gallon gasoline and the challenges of a tight credit environment. A Pew Center survey showed that, even by mid-July 2008, many Americans still had scant knowledge of the candidates' policies on foreign affairs. Other recent polls give a mixed picture. One shows support for Obama's calls to move the front (CQPolitics) in the war against al-Qaeda to Afghanistan. Another survey gives McCain a solid edge on the question of who would be a more effective commander in chief (CBS News). Beset with economic concerns, Americans may be less inclined to consider the world at large. Newsweek International editor Fareed Zakaria says the country finds itself in "surprisingly normal" circumstances despite troop deployments totaling nearly 200,000 on two fronts. "The country may be engaged in wars, but it is not at war," he writes.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
