home > by publication type > daily analysis > Peace, Justice, and Darfur
Email
| Author: | Stephanie Hanson |
|---|
Refugee women in the Otash refugee camp in Sudan on September 26, 2007. (AP/Alfred de Montesquiou)
On July 14, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court took the first steps toward indicting Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir. Bashir is accused of genocide and crimes against humanity in Darfur, where an estimated 200,000 have died and more than 2.5 million have been displaced from their homes. The move toward indicting him set off controversy and a debate about whether it would further complicate efforts to bring peace to the country. While some experts predict the prosecutor's charges will obstruct negotiations with Khartoum, others argue that only sustained international pressure on Bashir's regime will spur a peace process.
Africa has dealt with transitional justice in various ways. The 2003 indictment of Liberian President Charles Taylor by the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone is held up as a model of justice leading to peace. South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which granted amnesty in exchange for confessions of guilt from perpetrators of abuses under apartheid rule, represents an alternative model. Because the ICC judges will take several months to determine whether to indict Bashir and issue an arrest warrant, Sudan's path has yet to be determined.
Whatever happens, the process will come with its complications. Many critics of the ICC prosecutor's efforts are supporters of the Sudanese government. China, which invests in Sudan's oil industry, suggests UN members listen to the concerns of Arab and African leaders (Reuters) who say pressing charges against Bashir could result in further instability in Sudan. The Arab League cautioned against (AP) the "dangerous ramifications on the peace process in Sudan." The African Union, which has peacekeepers deployed in Darfur, wants the United Nations to suspend the ICC's investigation (VOA).
The UN Security Council has the authority to suspend an ICC investigation (Economist) for a year. Such a suspension has already been proposed for another ICC case—that of the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda. The Security Council has yet to take up that case, and it's not clear whether it will consider suspending the Sudan investigation. The council itself sent the Sudan case to the ICC for investigation in 2005, which resulted in the indictment of two high-level Sudanese officials in 2007.
Some critics of the Bashir indictment believe it would imperil the people of Darfur—who might become targets of government-backed reprisals—and could damage peace talks. "If all-out regime change is not the goal, then to secure a peace in Darfur means negotiating with Bashir rather than fantasizing about arresting, trying and imprisoning him," writes David Rieff in a Los Angeles Times op-ed. But many analysts say the peace process was faltering long before the ICC announcement. "The unpalatable truth is that there is no peace in Darfur," the head of the joint UN/AU peacekeeping force in Darfur wrote in South Africa's Mail and Guardian. Two mediators from the UN and AU recently stepped down, to be replaced by an envoy that does not speak either English or Arabic (Reuters), the primary languages of those at the negotiating table.
Several human rights activists say Darfuris strongly favor bringing Bashir to trial. When Sara Darehshori, senior counsel in Human Rights Watch's international justice program, interviewed Darfur refugees in Chad last year, they asked her when Bashir would be indicted by the ICC. "There is no justice in Sudan," one refugee told her. "If there was, we would not be here." A report from ENOUGH, a project to end genocide and crimes against humanity, argues that the only way to end the conflict in Sudan is to introduce accountability. But Sudan expert Alex de Waal suggests on his blog that support for the ICC is not unanimous inside Darfur, and outside the region there is strong sentiment against the possibility of an indictment.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.