Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Beyond Russia's Near Abroad
| Author: |
|---|
The foreign ministers from Russia and Germany along with the U.S. Secretary of State in Berlin, Germany Jan. 22, 2008 to discuss Iran's nuclear program. (AP/Michael Sohn)
The Kremlin's relations with many Western capitals had grown fraught long before Russian military actions in Georgia this month triggered some of the sharpest rhetorical exchanges since the end of the Cold War. Contention has built up in the UN Security Council over issues ranging from Kosovo (RIA Novosti) to Myanmar to Zimbabwe (CNN). New energy and security alignments in the Caucasus and Central Asia have revived talk of a "Great Game" between Russia and the West in the region.
But Russia has remained a Western partner, with a full place at the elite Group of Eight (G-8) table, and has served a critical role in issues ranging from nuclear nonproliferation to combating terrorism. Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), long engaged in efforts to limit the spread of nuclear materials from the former Soviet Union, says: "The facts are that the United States has to work with Russia on Iran, on nuclear problems of proliferation, on a whole raft of trade issues." Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder told Spiegel magazine: "There is not a single critical problem in world politics or the global economy that could be solved without Russia—not the nuclear conflict with Iran, the North Korea question and certainly not bringing peace to the Middle East." Schroeder, who holds a top position with a German-Russian-Dutch joint venture working to bring Russian natural gas to Western markets, cited a mutual dependency of Europe needing Russian gas and Russia needing European markets.
Yet U.S. leaders, in particular, have warned of consequences for the relationship if Russia fails to abide by commitments to withdraw forces from Georgia, which Washington has backed for NATO membership. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates canceled two joint military exercises with Russia scheduled for this month. While dismissing the prospects for a military conflict, he warned Russia (NYT) if it does not step back what from what he called "its aggressive posture" in Georgia, the U.S.-Russia relationship could suffer lasting damage. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Russia can't use "disproportionate force" against Georgia and remain on track for integration into international institutions (WashPost).
Questions remain about the degree to which the United States and its transatlantic partners will agree over tough steps to isolate and pressure Russia. German Chancellor Angela Merkel this week signaled (BBC) that NATO membership was still open to Georgia, while at the same time her foreign minister stressed important Western institutions must remain open to Russia. The European Union's newest members have so far shown more solidarity with Georgia's leadership than many of the bloc's older members. Says Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves: " I think there is actually a very pro-Russia, Russophile coalition inside the European Union which places good business relations above European values of human rights, democracy, and so forth" (RFE/RL). Sabine Fischer from the European Institute for Security Studies in Paris tells Eurasianet: "There is no EU when it comes to conflict resolution in Georgia, there are only member states."
Another question is how much Western pressure and engagement matter to Russia's current leadership. Analyst Pierre Hassner, writing recently in the Journal of Democracy, says after years of perceived slights, Russia's foreign policy has in recent years seemed to be based on thwarting the West (PDF). "Obstructionism seems to be a priority even when Moscow shares Western goals, such as avoiding an Iranian nuclear capacity," he writes. RFE/RL's Daniel Kimmage writes that Russia's elite cares mostly about serving private financial interests and maintaining power but that the Georgian conflict might be seen as a"tipping point at which domestic propaganda is beginning to force action abroad." Russian leaders, meanwhile, insist the military offensive into Georgia was prompted by Georgia's recklessness (FT), and are known to be eager for a change in leadership in Tbilisi.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
