home > by publication type > daily analysis > Picking Presidents and Foreign Policy
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Jubilation as a presidential National Convention concludes. (AP/Mark Humphrey)
The start of the presidential nominating conventions finds the economy fixed uppermost in Americans' concerns. But in various ways, national security could underpin many of the discussions of political leaders and activists at the two major party conventions that kick off the final stages of the campaigns of Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). A draft of the Democratic platform, for instance, links the two issues, especially where matters such as energy policy and manufacturing competitiveness are concerned. [The Republican platform has not yet been released]. As Richard C. Holbrooke, a senior foreign policy official in past Democratic administrations, writes in the latest Foreign Affairs, reviving the U.S. economy "is as important to the nation's long-term security as is keeping U.S. military strength unchallengeable."
National security itself will get full attention; the Democratic Party in Denver this week will set aside August 27 to discuss it, while the Republicans will cap their four-day convention in Minneapolis on September 4 with a focus on the issue. McCain has emphasized his national security credentials throughout the campaign and underlined that "defeating radical Islamist extremists is the national security challenge of our time." Obama offers a slightly different emphasis on the main threats (Foreign Affairs) facing the country, highlighting the need to prevent nuclear weapons from getting into the hands of terrorists. Of the two current wars U.S. forces are waging, McCain stresses the importance of victory in Iraq. Obama says Afghanistan is the "central front in our battle against terrorism" (CBS).
To date, some of the candidates' sharpest exchanges have involved national security. In particular, McCain has challenged Obama's call for a sixteen-month timetable for withdrawing most U.S. troops from Iraq, as well as his signals that he would engage U.S. foes in more intense diplomacy. Obama's selection of Sen. Joseph R. Biden (D-DE) as his vice presidential candidate on August 23 is expected to stiffen the debate between the two sides. The candidates have also offered differing views on issues ranging from nuclear energy to the merits of NAFTA.
Analysts say Republican presidential campaigns have traditionally triumphed over the Democrats on the strength of their perceived national security competence, most recently in President George W. Bush's 2004 defeat of Sen. John Kerry (D-MA). Samantha Power, a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School who has advised Obama, writes in the New York Review of Books that this year Democrats must stop shying away from national security discussions and instead confidently advance their own plans for securing the country. At the same time, writes CFR's Peter Beinart, Obama should avoid changing positions in an effort to look strong because he risks coming across as "inauthentic and insincere" (WashPost). Democratic strategist Mark J. Penn says that while it will be important to establish Obama's fitness to handle global crises, the decisive issue will be how well the Obama campaign presents its economic road map (Politico).
Although both McCain and Obama have offered themselves as clear alternatives to the Bush administration, a number of analysts now believe either candidate could find himself carrying on many of the policy initiatives Bush adopted in his second term. Newsweek International's Fareed Zakaria, for example, credits the administration's more pragmatic policies on cases such as Iran, North Korea, and the Mideast peace process. Robert Kagan, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who advises McCain's campaign, writes in the latest Foreign Affairs that the Bush administration has corrected a number of its mistakes, leaving the U.S. position in the world today "not nearly as bad as some claim." On the other hand, writes political analyst Ronald Brownstein in The Atlantic, Bush's two terms leave U.S. politics "polarized as sharply as at any point in the past century." Progress on problems from energy to national security, he writes, stands a better chance if the new occupant of the White House redefines his party as "more flexible, inclusive, and practical than it is seen to be today."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.