home > by publication type > daily analysis > Russia's Arms Control Ripples
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles in the annual Victory Day parade in Moscow. May, 2008. (AP/Alexander Zemlianichenko)
Reverberations from Russia's conflict with Georgia extend in many directions, highlighting the extent of Russian power in its own region and beyond (BBC). In the event of a further chilling of ties with the West, Russia's soft-power sticks (NYT) include everything from potential manipulation of energy supplies to limiting NATO security forces' access to Afghanistan through Russia and Central Asia. Western states, for their part, have signaled potential trade moves against Russia and the end to "business as usual." But one potential casualty that causes special worry for some analysts is the suspension of cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and other arms control efforts.
The Wall Street Journal reported on August 23, the Bush administration's "landmark nuclear-cooperation agreement" with Moscow could be derailed following Russia's moves in Georgia. The deal, which the White House had hoped to finalize in September, aimed to increase U.S.-Russia cooperation on peaceful nuclear technology. But as one U.S. official told the paper, nuclear deals are "no longer business as usual." The Financial Times reported on August 25 that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is expected to call on President Bush to recall the civil nuclear deal with Russia from Congress. "At this point, it's dead," a congressional staffer told the paper.
Pressure to disband or modify arms control agreements and treaties is not new. Russia, which possesses nearly half (CDI) of the world's nuclear weapons, had already suspended (BBC) full participation in the 1990 Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty to protest U.S. plans to build a missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland. (U.S. and Polish officials finalized a missile shield deal in mid-August, angering Russia and leading to reports of a potential arms sale between Russia and Syria). Moscow has also long threatened a pullout (VOA) from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, inked by Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan in 1987 to prohibit development and deployment of some ballistic missiles.
Washington, too, has sought changes to arms accords it has viewed as outdated and cumbersome. The Bush administration withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002, announcing it needed a better framework to protect the United States from new kinds of missile threats. Russia called the move a mistake. According to Stratfor, an intelligence analysis website, the Bush administration has also ignored Moscow's calls for an extension of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which expires in 2009.
At the same time, Russia and the United States have a recent history of cooperating on nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons reduction. Since 1991, as part of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, the U.S. government has spent over $4.4 billion to dismantle and destroy weapons inside the former Soviet Union. Proliferation experts Alexei Arbatov and Rose Gottemoeller, writing in Arms Control Today, say both sides "have ample will" to return to the negotiating table once President Bush leaves office. But some analysts say disputes over Georgia threaten to hamper larger issues like nonproliferation. CFR President Richard N. Haass, writing in Newsweek, says the conflict in Georgia could leave negotiations over global nuclear stockpiles and other thorny issues unresolved.
Just how much leverage the West has to influence Moscow is not clear. Andrew Wilson, a scholar at the European Council on Foreign Relations, says the relevance of the European Union—which has emerged at the forefront of diplomacy on the South Ossetia dispute—will be tested by the outcome (Reuters). French President Nicolas Sarkozy has called an emergency summit (France24) of the bloc on September 1 to discuss relations with Russia. Meanwhile, the Bush administration next week will make its highest profile visit yet to Georgia, sending Vice President Dick Cheney, as part of a trip that includes stops in the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and Ukraine. F. Stephen Larrabee, an expert on Eastern Europe at the RAND Corporation, says the diplomatic surge is necessary to prevent further destabilization. "It's very important that this spiral of action and reaction not be allowed to get out of hand," Larrabee says.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.