home > by publication type > daily analysis > Russia's Security Ties in Asia
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Joint exercises between Chinese and Russian militaries in Russia's Ural Mountains in August, 2007. (AP)
Amid growing international criticism for its military actions in Georgia, Russia is seeking support from some of its neighbors. At the annual summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), on August 28, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev hailed "united" support from member countries China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. He called it a "serious signal" to the West (al-Jazeera). But the SCO countries, including China, expressed concern over recent tensions on the South Ossetian issue and struck a cautious note (FT) in their final statement. Meeting in the Tajik capital of Dushanbe, the six members, along with observers Iran, Mongolia, India and Pakistan, discussed security, economics, and cultural cooperation (Xinhua)
Unlike the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the SCO is not a mutual defense pact. But political and military coordination is becoming a hallmark of the organization, writes J. Peter Pham, director of the Nelson Institute for International and Public Affairs at James Madison University. The SCO has held a number of joint military exercises, most recently in 2007 near Russia's Ural Mountains. In October last year, it signed a memorandum of understanding with the Collective Security Treaty Organization, a military alliance of several former Soviet states.
To date, the SCO's Afghan policy has been of special concern to Western strategists. The SCO formally seeks to promote Afghan political stability and economic development through its Afghanistan contact group. But under the aegis of SCO, China and Russia, suspicious of U.S. and NATO presence in the region, asked countries in the U.S.-led coalition to withdraw their forces from Central Asia in 2005. The Uzbek government moved to eject U.S. forces from Karshi-Khanabad base the same year. Central Asian countries give operational support for coalition forces in Afghanistan and provide humanitarian aid to northern Afghanistan. However, SCO membership has not stopped (PDF) Central Asian states from developing military cooperation with the United States and NATO, points out Oksana Antonenko, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. And Russia itself has made no move to ban NATO's use of Russian land for nonmilitary shipments to Afghanistan.
Still, some analysts see the SCO as a vehicle for Russia and China to curb U.S. access to the region's vast energy supplies. SCO's possible expansion, especially if it included Iran, would only add to Western suspicions against the alliance. Iran, an observer, has applied for permanent status. The Russian and Iranian presidents will be meeting (TehranTimes) on the sidelines of the summit. Robert Kagan, senior associate at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, writes in the New Republic: "Russia and China are promoting an international order that places a high value on national sovereignty and can protect autocratic governments from foreign interference."
However, Bobo Lo, director of the Russia and China programs at the London-based Centre for European Reform calls the alliance an "axis of convenience." Writing for openDemocracy, he argues that Russia and China have very different objectives in Central Asia. Russia, he says, wants to reassert its regional leadership there, while China seeks energy ties. Erica Marat, a research fellow with the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program Joint Center writes that they also "envision relations with the West differently." Citing these differences, some experts say the SCO is unlikely to pose a significant threat to U.S. interests in Central Asia.
Recent moves by Russia may also accentuate these differences. China, facing separatist yearnings in Tibet and Xinjiang, is wary of Russia's recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states. So far, China has kept a low profile on the Russia-Georgia conflict, urging all sides to use negotiations and dialogue (VOA) to resolve the issue. China prefers a world in which major powers "don't touch each other's red lines," Xia Yishan of China's International Studies Institute, a Foreign Ministry think tank, told Newsweek.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.