Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Wall Street's Coming Reforms
| Author: |
|---|
(AP/Frank Franklin II)
The turmoil that rocked the global financial sector this week, bringing storied institutions to their knees and prompting harrowing declines for major stock indices, left more than a measure of uncertainty in its wake. Analysts generally declined to hazard near-term economic predictions, focusing instead on what might halt the contagion. Just when the government appeared to have said "enough," refusing to save the investment bank Lehman Brothers, the potential collapse of America's largest insurer, AIG, forced Washington back into the bailout pool (WSJ). One of the few consistent refrains was that reform of the financial system—on a much larger scale than many had previously considered—now seems increasingly likely (WSJ). Yet with a new U.S. president and Congress set to assume power, analysts say 2009 could bring dramatic regulatory changes for U.S. banks, potentially spelling major changes for the future structure of the global financial network.
The likely starting point, reports Dow Jones, is that the sweeping proposals put forth earlier this year by U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson could gain traction. Paulson's plan calls for a broad expansion of the Federal Reserve's powers and, over the longer-term, a reorganization of several government regulatory agencies to eliminate overlapping areas of responsibility and the loopholes created between them. Among other changes, the plan advocates merging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and calls for shutting down the U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision, which currently monitors savings and loans operations. The plan also calls for a federal charter for all banks—at present, some are managed by states, and others by the federal government. In an interview discussing the proposals, CFR's Benn Steil says the plan rightly attempts to eliminate gaps and overlaps in the current system, but also notes that practical tensions could arise—particularly when merging the SEC and CFTC—given differences in how they operate. He adds, however, that if the plan succeeds in making the system more cohesive, it could bolster the competitiveness of the U.S. financial services sector internationally.
Beyond Paulson's plan, lawmakers have floated other ideas for making the financial system work more smoothly. Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), the chair of the House Financial Services Committee, endorses the idea of a new federal institution (WashPost) to manage the assets of insolvent institutions. House minority leader Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) has "flatly dismissed" the idea, but the minority's views may hold considerably less sway after January. In any case, both sides agree that policy change on Capitol Hill is unlikely until next year.
As Wall Street works to put out existing fires, some changes are taking place on their own accord. Slate notes that Bank of America's buyout of Merrill Lynch shattered a long-standing policy separating governance of commercial and investment banks. The result, the article says, is more power for the Fed, which will now have oversight of Merrill's investment banking operations. The Financial Times' John Plender, in a video analysis, called it "the death knell of the independent investment bank."
Beyond technical market governance, some analysts say markets face a bigger problem. "The Street's fundamental problem isn't lack of capital," writes Robert Reich, the former U.S. Labor Secretary. "It's lack of trust. And without trust, Wall Street might as well fold up its fancy tents." Reich says the trust problem goes even deeper than the subprime mortgage mess. The recent market blowups, he says, have exposed a complicated game involving subjective ratings agencies, off-balance sheet liabilities, complex derivatives, and seemingly endless leverage. Here, however, the regulatory picture gets more murky—particularly given the global nature of financial markets. Once a new president takes office, Washington may well act to limit how much risk U.S. investment banks can assume. But analysts say that won't necessarily solve the problem. If Washington imposes very strict regulations on investment banks, Plender says, "a lot of those very clever, ambitious people, the investment bankers, will jump ship." The effort to regulate could thus backfire, he says, prompting an expansion of the "shadow banking system" of hedge funds and financial institutions in countries with looser laws, and leaving Washington's regulators with even less power than they have now.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President, experts from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
A selection of Foreign Affairs pieces by and about the preeminent political scientist of the last half century.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
