Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Global Health Spending Priorities
| Author: |
|---|
Women line up to be checked for AIDS at the Gheskio medical center in Port-au-Prince, March 12, 2008. (AP/Ariana Cubillos)
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which focuses significant assistance on fifteen countries that contain about 50 percent of people infected globally, is widely lauded as a success in improving AIDS treatment and prevention in those countries. When Congress reauthorized the program for another five years early this summer, it increased funding to almost $50 billion through 2013, up from $15 billion in its first authorization. The law also includes billions to combat malaria and tuberculosis, the number one killer of AIDS patients. Few dispute the program's success. CFR Senior Fellow Michael J. Gerson points to Rwanda (WashPost), where thanks to PEPFAR, 92 percent of HIV/AIDS patients now have access to AIDS drugs, up from just 4 percent in 2003.
Yet, for all the accolades, some health advocates worry that focusing on just a few diseases has come at the expense of other health and development issues, including infant mortality and clean water. Daniel Halperin, a senior research scientist at Harvard's School of Public Health, notes the United States spent $3 billion on HIV/AIDS in Africa compared with just $30 million for safe drinking water (NYT)-calling the imbalance "disastrously inequitable." He notes that Ethiopia, Congo, Nigeria have "relatively low" HIV/AIDS rates but represent one-fifth of global deaths from diarrhea-often caused by poor water sanitation. In 2008, HIV/AIDS represented around 60 percent of total U.S. funding for global health. That year, U.S. funding for maternal health and child survival was roughly 27 percent. About 2 million people die from AIDS each year. That compares to nearly 10 million children (PDF) who die of a variety of other preventable causes before their fifth birthday.
Though PEPFAR and other HIV/AIDs initiatives have helped build new clinics and labs, as well as trained health professionals, some advocates assert it has created two-tiered health systems in some countries-because HIV/AIDS patients are often sequestered away from other patients. CFR Senior Fellow Laurie Garrett notes the "resulting segregation has reinforced the anti-HIV stigma and helped create cadres of health-care workers who function largely independently from countries' other health-related systems" (Foreign Affairs).
Some experts are also worrying that PEPFAR's massive effort to treat at least 3 million patients for the rest of their lives amounts to the world's first global entitlement program (PDF). The program is already treating about half that number. Once treatment has started, experts argue it would be "immoral to withdraw the financial assistance that pays for the therapy" since it would amount to a death sentence for those who rely on it (WashPost).
The debate over disparities in HIV/AIDS spending versus other health needs extends beyond America's development budget. The issue pits HIV/AIDS advocates against other health constituencies, and has spawned a dialogue about priorities. Roger England, head of the Health Systems Workshop in Grenada, points out that AIDs funding (BMJ) receives about 25 percent of global health funding, though the disease represents less than 4 percent of global mortality. He argues the disparity cannot be justified. But HIV/AIDS advocates counter that the disease is exceptional and resources channeled to treat it have been instrumental in improving healthcare (BMJ) overall. Brook K. Baker, a law professor and policy adviser for Health Gap (Global Access Project), says other health issues were neglected long before HIV/AIDs gained attention and maintains that "AIDS programming does not divert attention from other health needs."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
