home > by publication type > daily analysis > Global Health Spending Priorities
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Women line up to be checked for AIDS at the Gheskio medical center in Port-au-Prince, March 12, 2008. (AP/Ariana Cubillos)
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which focuses significant assistance on fifteen countries that contain about 50 percent of people infected globally, is widely lauded as a success in improving AIDS treatment and prevention in those countries. When Congress reauthorized the program for another five years early this summer, it increased funding to almost $50 billion through 2013, up from $15 billion in its first authorization. The law also includes billions to combat malaria and tuberculosis, the number one killer of AIDS patients. Few dispute the program's success. CFR Senior Fellow Michael J. Gerson points to Rwanda (WashPost), where thanks to PEPFAR, 92 percent of HIV/AIDS patients now have access to AIDS drugs, up from just 4 percent in 2003.
Yet, for all the accolades, some health advocates worry that focusing on just a few diseases has come at the expense of other health and development issues, including infant mortality and clean water. Daniel Halperin, a senior research scientist at Harvard's School of Public Health, notes the United States spent $3 billion on HIV/AIDS in Africa compared with just $30 million for safe drinking water (NYT)-calling the imbalance "disastrously inequitable." He notes that Ethiopia, Congo, Nigeria have "relatively low" HIV/AIDS rates but represent one-fifth of global deaths from diarrhea-often caused by poor water sanitation. In 2008, HIV/AIDS represented around 60 percent of total U.S. funding for global health. That year, U.S. funding for maternal health and child survival was roughly 27 percent. About 2 million people die from AIDS each year. That compares to nearly 10 million children (PDF) who die of a variety of other preventable causes before their fifth birthday.
Though PEPFAR and other HIV/AIDs initiatives have helped build new clinics and labs, as well as trained health professionals, some advocates assert it has created two-tiered health systems in some countries-because HIV/AIDS patients are often sequestered away from other patients. CFR Senior Fellow Laurie Garrett notes the "resulting segregation has reinforced the anti-HIV stigma and helped create cadres of health-care workers who function largely independently from countries' other health-related systems" (Foreign Affairs).
Some experts are also worrying that PEPFAR's massive effort to treat at least 3 million patients for the rest of their lives amounts to the world's first global entitlement program (PDF). The program is already treating about half that number. Once treatment has started, experts argue it would be "immoral to withdraw the financial assistance that pays for the therapy" since it would amount to a death sentence for those who rely on it (WashPost).
The debate over disparities in HIV/AIDS spending versus other health needs extends beyond America's development budget. The issue pits HIV/AIDS advocates against other health constituencies, and has spawned a dialogue about priorities. Roger England, head of the Health Systems Workshop in Grenada, points out that AIDs funding (BMJ) receives about 25 percent of global health funding, though the disease represents less than 4 percent of global mortality. He argues the disparity cannot be justified. But HIV/AIDS advocates counter that the disease is exceptional and resources channeled to treat it have been instrumental in improving healthcare (BMJ) overall. Brook K. Baker, a law professor and policy adviser for Health Gap (Global Access Project), says other health issues were neglected long before HIV/AIDs gained attention and maintains that "AIDS programming does not divert attention from other health needs."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.