Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > The World Watches Wall Street
| Author: |
|---|
Tourists outside the NASDAQ MarketSite studio in Times Square. (AP/Julie Jacobson)
Last year, as U.S. and Western European economies stagnated, the developing world surged. Some economists declared a new world order characterized by "decoupled" markets (Economist). Global economies no longer relied on U.S. markets for sustenance and growth, they said, and would rise and fall independently of U.S. growth. Now, amidst the major crisis of confidence (FT) that has seized the U.S. financial system, that theory meets its first major test. The early results, experts say, reveal a mix of outcomes that neither validates nor disproves the decoupling theory, but perhaps tempers it.
Certainly, the world's stock markets are susceptible to contagion. From Western Europe to East Asia, major markets suffered losses as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and other U.S. indices sagged this September. Indices in large emerging markets have been hit particularly hard--Russia's main index, for instance, has lost more than half its value since May, and Chinese, Brazilian, and Indian stocks have also suffered steep losses. In a recent interview with CFR.org, Al Breach, a financial analyst and former managing director for UBS, says emerging markets that experienced a major run-up in share prices are now witnessing a "flight to quality."
Looking beyond stock prices, Europe's financial institutions have suffered alongside their U.S. counterparts--the most recent high-profile blowup being the collapse and nationalization (Telegraph) of the British mortgage lender Bradford & Bingley. As these financial concerns have metastasized, several measures of European business confidence have fallen (Economist). EU officials have been left scrambling for a regulatory fix (Deutsche-Welle), much like the United States itself. The chief economist of one German bank lamented: "Germany can't decouple."
The U.S. crisis is wreaking havoc in other ways as well. Major oil producers, which saw their national coffers bulge as oil prices skyrocketed over the past twelve months, now face the opposite problem. Oil prices have plummeted since early summer, falling from highs of over $147 per barrel to lows just over $90 in mid-September. Some experts credit the decline to fears of falling global oil demand (MSNBC), given the economic pinch created by the U.S. downturn. Others say the decline has been caused more directly by financial institutions, which invested heavily in commodities over the past couple of years and now in many cases have had to unwind those positions (WashPost) due to tight credit.
Despite the seeming global nature of the current crisis, however, the decoupling debate remains far from settled. Apart from the recent stock market turmoil in China, India, and Brazil, those countries still show strong overall economic growth--though bubbling inflation and fears that rising food prices or political unrest could undermine this growth remain as concerns. Some Middle Eastern countries are seeking to use the opportunity (al-Ahram) of U.S. financial problems to push their own plans of establishing regional financial hubs. To an extent, this shift was already under way, but the present turmoil has helped accelerate it, and the trend certainly suggests that some world economies are in the process of decoupling.
In some ways, the question of whether developing economies ever fully "decouple" is semantics. Speaking at CFR in January, Paul Calello, the CEO of investment banking at Credit Suisse, said he thought the term is "overused," and some economists have argued it vastly oversimplifies a complex situation and should be abandoned altogether. The Economist piece quoted above, which argued in March 2008 that a process of decoupling was under way, noted that a severe U.S. economic downturn would undeniably have a "nasty impact on the developing world." Still, it expressed hope that developing countries would be able to use their own monetary and fiscal policies to cushion this blow, if and when it happened. Now, with U.S. markets in turmoil, their ability to do this is being tested.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
